Wildlife Feeding: Anza vs Palm Springs
How do wildlife feeding rules compare between Anza, CA and Palm Springs, CA?
Anza and Palm Springs have similar restriction levels.
Anza, CA
Riverside County
Riverside County Ordinance 630 and California Fish & Game Code Β§251.3 prohibit intentionally feeding big-game mammals (bears, deer, coyotes, mountain lions). Feeding wildlife creates dangerous habituation and triggers public-safety responses. Bird feeders are generally allowed but can be cited if they attract rodents, bears, or create a nuisance.
View full Anza rules βPalm Springs, CA
Riverside County
Palm Springs prohibits feeding coyotes, bobcats, mountain lions, bighorn sheep, and other wildlife descending from the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains. Palm Springs Municipal Code Chapter 10.80 and California Fish and Game Code Β§Β§251.1 and 4181 make intentional feeding of large wildlife unlawful. Violations carry fines and the critical safety risk of habituated predators in residential neighborhoods.
View full Palm Springs rules βKey Facts Comparison
| Fact | Anza | Palm Springs |
|---|---|---|
| - | - |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Anza FAQ
Palm Springs FAQ
Compare other topics
See how Anza and Palm Springs compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool