ADU Owner Occupancy: Arlington vs North Richland Hills
How do adu owner occupancy rules compare between Arlington, TX and North Richland Hills, TX?
Arlington, TX
Tarrant County
Arlington typically imposes owner-occupancy as a condition of the Specific Use Permit granted for accessory living quarters under UDC Article 4. The owner must occupy either the principal dwelling or the ADU as a permanent residence. A recorded deed restriction with the Tarrant County Clerk is generally required. Texas has not preempted local owner-occupancy rules.
View full Arlington rules →North Richland Hills, TX
Tarrant County
No data available yet for North Richland Hills.
Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Arlington | North Richland Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Code Section | Arlington UDC Art. 4 (SUP) | - |
| Owner Occupancy | Required (typical SUP condition) | - |
| Deed Restriction | Recorded with Tarrant County | - |
| Both Units Rented | Prohibited (single-family district) | - |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Arlington FAQ
Does Arlington require the owner to live on the property to have an ADU?
Yes typically. Arlington City Council routinely imposes owner-occupancy as a condition of the Specific Use Permit for accessory living quarters, with a deed restriction recorded against the property at Tarrant County.
Can an LLC own a property with an ADU in Arlington?
LLC ownership is allowed but complicates owner-occupancy. The SUP typically requires the principal member or trustee to reside on-site and sign a residency affidavit. This is reviewed case-by-case by Planning and Zoning Commission.
North Richland Hills FAQ
No FAQs available.
Compare other topics
See how Arlington and North Richland Hills compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool