Pool Barriers: Kent vs Kirkland
How do pool barriers rules compare between Kent, WA and Kirkland, WA?
Kent and Kirkland have similar restriction levels.
Kent, WA
King County
Private pools in Kent must have a barrier at least 4 feet tall with self-closing, self-latching gates per IBC Appendix G and IRC Section R326. Public pools must meet the 6-foot (72-inch) barrier under WAC 246-260.
View full Kent rules →Kirkland, WA
King County
Pools and spas deeper than 24 inches need a 48-inch barrier with self-closing self-latching gate under the Washington State Building Code and IRC Appendix G. Openings cannot pass a 4-inch sphere.
View full Kirkland rules →Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Kent | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Residential Barrier | 48 inches minimum | - |
| Public Pool Barrier | 72 inches (WAC 246-260) | - |
| Gate | Self-closing, self-latching | Self-close and self-latch |
| Sphere Test | 4 inch max opening | - |
| Height | - | 48 inches minimum |
| Sphere Gap | - | No 4-inch pass |
| Code | - | IRC Appendix G via WSBC |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Kent FAQ
How tall must a pool fence be in Kent?
48 inches for a residential pool under IRC R326. Public pools and apartment pools need 72 inches under WAC 246-260-031.
Does a hot tub need a fence in Kent?
Hot tubs with a locking safety cover meeting ASTM F1346 are exempt from the 4-foot barrier rule. Otherwise fencing is required.
Kirkland FAQ
Does Kirkland require a fence around my pool?
Yes. Any pool or spa deeper than 24 inches needs a 48-inch compliant barrier under the Washington State Building Code and IRC Appendix G.
Can a pool cover replace the fence?
Not for a swimming pool. Only rigid locking safety covers meeting ASTM F1346 on hot tubs and spas qualify as an alternative to the full barrier.
Compare other topics
See how Kent and Kirkland compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool