Paid Leave Preemption: Salt Lake City vs Sandy
How do paid leave preemption rules compare between Salt Lake City, UT and Sandy, UT?
Salt Lake City has fewer restrictions than Sandy.
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake County
Utah Code 34-49 expressly preempts any city or county from requiring private employers to provide paid sick leave, vacation, or family leave, blocking Salt Lake City from following Denver or Seattle models.
View full Salt Lake City rules →Sandy, UT
Salt Lake County
Utah preempts local paid leave mandates through employment regulation provisions, leaving private-sector leave benefits to employer discretion or state law.
View full Sandy rules →Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Salt Lake City | Sandy |
|---|---|---|
| State law | UT 34-49 | - |
| Local mandates | Preempted entirely | - |
| Federal | FMLA unpaid only | - |
| State workers | Get paid leave | - |
| - | - |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Salt Lake City FAQ
Can Salt Lake require paid sick days?
No. Utah Code 34-49 preempts any local paid leave mandate. Salt Lake City cannot follow Denver, Seattle, or San Francisco models requiring paid sick leave.
Do I get any paid leave in Utah?
Only what your employer voluntarily provides. Federal FMLA gives unpaid leave at employers with 50+ workers. Utah has no statutory paid leave requirement for private workers.
Sandy FAQ
Compare other topics
See how Salt Lake City and Sandy compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool