Kent vs Redmond
How do hoa restrictions rules compare between Kent, WA and Redmond, WA?
Kent and Redmond have similar restriction levels.
Kent, WA
King County
Washington RCW 64.38.055 bars homeowner associations from prohibiting solar collectors on homes, though they may adopt reasonable aesthetic rules. Kent has no stricter local preemption.
View full Kent rules →Redmond, WA
King County
Washington RCW 64.38 and RCW 64.90 limit HOA authority to ban solar devices. Redmond HOAs can set reasonable aesthetic rules but cannot flatly prohibit residential solar installations.
View full Redmond rules →Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Kent | Redmond |
|---|---|---|
| State law | RCW 64.38.055 protects solar | RCW 64.38 and 64.90 |
| Allowed HOA rules | Aesthetic placement only | - |
| Full bans | Not enforceable | - |
| Local preemption | Kent defers to state | - |
| HOA ban | - | Generally unenforceable |
| Aesthetic rules | - | Reasonable rules allowed |
| City review | - | No aesthetic block |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Kent FAQ
Can my Kent HOA stop me from installing solar?
No, state law blocks outright bans, though the HOA can require reasonable aesthetic placement that does not harm performance.
What if the HOA denies my solar permit?
Document the denial, request the board cite the specific rule, and consult an attorney about RCW 64.38.055 rights.
Redmond FAQ
Can my Redmond HOA stop me from installing solar?
No, Washington RCW 64.38 prohibits HOAs from unreasonably prohibiting residential solar, though reasonable placement rules are allowed.
What if my CC&Rs say no roof additions?
Those provisions are generally unenforceable against solar collectors under state law; consult an attorney for disputes.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool