Tenant Anti-Harassment: Mountain View vs Palo Alto
How do tenant anti-harassment rules compare between Mountain View, CA and Palo Alto, CA?
Mountain View and Palo Alto have similar restriction levels.
Mountain View, CA
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara County has not adopted a countywide tenant anti-harassment ordinance for unincorporated areas. Tenants rely on California Civil Code §1940.2 against forcible exclusion plus tort remedies for retaliation or harassment.
View full Mountain View rules →Palo Alto, CA
Santa Clara County
Santa Clara County has not adopted a countywide tenant anti-harassment ordinance for unincorporated areas. Tenants rely on California Civil Code §1940.2 against forcible exclusion plus tort remedies for retaliation or harassment.
View full Palo Alto rules →Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Mountain View | Palo Alto |
|---|---|---|
| State law | Cal. Civ. Code §1940.2 | Cal. Civ. Code §1940.2 |
| Anti-retaliation | Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5 | Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5 |
| Statutory penalty | Up to $2,000 per violation | Up to $2,000 per violation |
| County code | No SCC unincorporated TAHO | No SCC unincorporated TAHO |
| Stronger cities | San Jose; Mountain View; Cupertino | San Jose; Mountain View; Cupertino |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Mountain View FAQ
What protects me from harassment in unincorporated Santa Clara County?
Civil Code §1940.2 bars forcible exclusion, threats, fraud, and utility shutoffs. Section 1942.5 bars retaliation. Common-law tort claims and small claims court provide additional damages remedies.
Are city tenant protection ordinances stronger?
Yes. San Jose's Tenant Protection Ordinance, Mountain View's CSFRA, and Cupertino's tenant protection rules each list specific harassment acts and impose larger administrative fines than state Civil Code §1940.2 allows.
Palo Alto FAQ
What protects me from harassment in unincorporated Santa Clara County?
Civil Code §1940.2 bars forcible exclusion, threats, fraud, and utility shutoffs. Section 1942.5 bars retaliation. Common-law tort claims and small claims court provide additional damages remedies.
Are city tenant protection ordinances stronger?
Yes. San Jose's Tenant Protection Ordinance, Mountain View's CSFRA, and Cupertino's tenant protection rules each list specific harassment acts and impose larger administrative fines than state Civil Code §1940.2 allows.
Compare other topics
See how Mountain View and Palo Alto compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool