Safety Rules: Oakley vs Richmond
How do safety rules rules compare between Oakley, CA and Richmond, CA?
Oakley and Richmond have similar restriction levels.
Oakley, CA
Contra Costa County
Oakley pools must comply with California's layered pool safety framework: barriers under HSC 115923, two approved drowning prevention features under HSC 115922, anti-entrapment drain covers under the Virginia Graeme Baker Act, and electrical safety per NEC 680. Real estate transfers require a pool safety disclosure.
View full Oakley rules →Richmond, CA
Contra Costa County
All swimming pool and spa drains in Richmond must comply with the federal Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act and California HSC §115928, requiring anti-entrapment drain covers meeting ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 standards. Single-drain pools generally require a second safety device such as a safety vacuum release system.
View full Richmond rules →Key Facts Comparison
| Fact | Oakley | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Fact | Two of seven drowning prevention features required (HSC 115922) | - |
| - | - |
Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.
Oakley FAQ
What are the seven pool safety features in California?
HSC 115922 lists: (1) enclosure, (2) removable mesh fencing with self-latching gate, (3) safety pool cover, (4) exit alarms on dwelling doors, (5) self-closing doors with high release, (6) ASTM-compliant pool alarm, and (7) other approved means. Two of the seven are required.
Does my existing Oakley pool built in 2005 need to be upgraded?
Pre-2007 pools are generally grandfathered for the two-feature rule unless a remodel over $5,000 triggers current code. The 60-inch enclosure requirement still applies, and VGB-compliant drain covers were federally mandated for all pools by 2008.
Richmond FAQ
Compare other topics
See how Oakley and Richmond compare on other ordinance categories.
Want to add a third city?
Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.
Open Comparison Tool