San Francisco Breed Restrictions Rules (2026): What You Need to Know
Few RestrictionsKey Facts
- State Preemption
- California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 prohibits all cities, including San Francisco, from banning or restricting any specific dog breed
- No Breed Bans
- Pit bulls, Rottweilers, German Shepherds, Dobermans, and all other breeds are legal to own in San Francisco with no breed-based restrictions
- Pit Bull Spay/Neuter
- San Francisco Health Code Section 44 requires mandatory spay/neuter for pit bull-type dogs — the only breed-specific requirement in the city
- Behavior-Based Enforcement
- All dogs are regulated equally based on behavior — dangerous and vicious dog declarations apply to any breed that bites or threatens public safety
- State Spay/Neuter Exception
- California HSC Section 122331 permits cities to adopt breed-specific mandatory spay/neuter ordinances — this is the only exception to the breed-ban preemption
- Enforcement Contact
- San Francisco Animal Care and Control at (415) 554-6364 handles dangerous dog investigations and spay/neuter compliance
The Short Version
San Francisco does not ban or restrict any specific dog breed. California state law (Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683) expressly prohibits cities and counties from enacting breed-specific legislation that targets dogs based solely on breed. This preemption applies to all California municipalities, including San Francisco. All dogs in San Francisco are regulated equally under the city's behavior-based dangerous and vicious animal ordinances administered by San Francisco Animal Care and Control (ACC). San Francisco does require mandatory spay/neuter for pit bull-type dogs under Health Code Section 44, which is permissible under a narrow exception in California Health and Safety Code Section 122331 that allows breed-specific mandatory spay/neuter ordinances.
Full Breakdown
San Francisco's approach to dog breed regulation is governed primarily by California state law, which imposes a strong preemption on breed-specific legislation. Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683, enacted in 1989, provides that no city, county, or city and county in California may adopt or enforce an ordinance, policy, resolution, or regulation specific to one breed or mixed breed of dog. This means San Francisco cannot ban pit bulls, Rottweilers, or any other breed, and cannot impose breed-specific ownership restrictions such as mandatory muzzling, special insurance requirements, or heightened confinement standards based solely on breed. All dog regulation in San Francisco must be behavior-based — applying equally to all breeds.
San Francisco's dangerous and vicious animal provisions, administered by Animal Care and Control (ACC), apply to any dog of any breed that has bitten a person, attacked another animal, or engaged in threatening behavior. When a dog is reported for such behavior, ACC conducts an investigation and may declare the dog potentially dangerous or vicious based on the specific incident, not the dog's breed. Owners of dogs declared potentially dangerous face requirements including secure confinement, leash and muzzle requirements in public, mandatory spay/neuter, microchipping, and proof of liability insurance of at least $50,000 to $100,000. Dogs declared vicious face even stricter conditions and may be subject to humane euthanasia in the most serious cases.
The one breed-specific requirement in San Francisco is the mandatory spay/neuter ordinance for pit bull-type dogs under Health Code Section 44. This ordinance requires that all pit bull-type dogs (defined to include American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, and dogs predominantly of these breeds based on physical characteristics) be spayed or neutered. This breed-specific spay/neuter requirement is lawful under the narrow exception in California Health and Safety Code Section 122331, which permits cities to adopt breed-specific mandatory spay/neuter ordinances even though broader breed bans are preempted. San Francisco adopted this ordinance in response to concerns about pit bull overpopulation in city shelters. Pit bull owners who fail to comply with the mandatory spay/neuter requirement may face fines and ACC enforcement action. Limited exemptions may be available for registered show dogs or dogs with veterinary certification that the surgery would be medically hazardous.
Landlords and homeowner associations in San Francisco may impose their own breed restrictions as a matter of private contract, and renters insurance or homeowner insurance policies may exclude certain breeds. These private restrictions are not government regulations and are not affected by the state preemption on breed-specific legislation. However, California Civil Code Section 4715 limits HOA ability to impose unreasonable pet restrictions. Contact San Francisco Animal Care and Control at (415) 554-6364 for questions about dangerous dog procedures, spay/neuter compliance, or breed-related concerns.
What Happens If You Violate This?
Because San Francisco has no breed ban, there are no violations for simply owning any breed of dog. However, failure to comply with the mandatory spay/neuter requirement for pit bull-type dogs under Health Code Section 44 may result in fines starting at $100 to $500 and ACC enforcement action, including impoundment of the unaltered dog until surgery is performed. Owners of dogs declared potentially dangerous or vicious — regardless of breed — face significant penalties for non-compliance with the conditions of the declaration, including fines of $500 or more per violation, impoundment of the dog, and potential criminal misdemeanor charges for maintaining a dangerous animal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are pit bulls banned in San Francisco?
Can San Francisco ever enact a breed ban in the future?
What happens if my dog is declared dangerous in San Francisco?
Sources & Official References
How does San Francisco compare?
See how San Francisco's breed restrictions rules stack up against other locations.