Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup
🔑 Rental Property Rules/Tenant Anti-Harassment

Tenant Anti-Harassment: Mountain View vs Sunnyvale

How do tenant anti-harassment rules compare between Mountain View, CA and Sunnyvale, CA?

Mountain View and Sunnyvale have similar restriction levels.

Mountain View, CA

Santa Clara County

Few Restrictions

Santa Clara County has not adopted a countywide tenant anti-harassment ordinance for unincorporated areas. Tenants rely on California Civil Code §1940.2 against forcible exclusion plus tort remedies for retaliation or harassment.

View full Mountain View rules →

Sunnyvale, CA

Santa Clara County

Few Restrictions

Santa Clara County has not adopted a countywide tenant anti-harassment ordinance for unincorporated areas. Tenants rely on California Civil Code §1940.2 against forcible exclusion plus tort remedies for retaliation or harassment.

View full Sunnyvale rules →

Key Facts Comparison

FactMountain ViewSunnyvale
State lawCal. Civ. Code §1940.2Cal. Civ. Code §1940.2
Anti-retaliationCal. Civ. Code §1942.5Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5
Statutory penaltyUp to $2,000 per violationUp to $2,000 per violation
County codeNo SCC unincorporated TAHONo SCC unincorporated TAHO
Stronger citiesSan Jose; Mountain View; CupertinoSan Jose; Mountain View; Cupertino

Highlighted rows indicate differences between cities.

Mountain View FAQ

What protects me from harassment in unincorporated Santa Clara County?

Civil Code §1940.2 bars forcible exclusion, threats, fraud, and utility shutoffs. Section 1942.5 bars retaliation. Common-law tort claims and small claims court provide additional damages remedies.

Are city tenant protection ordinances stronger?

Yes. San Jose's Tenant Protection Ordinance, Mountain View's CSFRA, and Cupertino's tenant protection rules each list specific harassment acts and impose larger administrative fines than state Civil Code §1940.2 allows.

Sunnyvale FAQ

What protects me from harassment in unincorporated Santa Clara County?

Civil Code §1940.2 bars forcible exclusion, threats, fraud, and utility shutoffs. Section 1942.5 bars retaliation. Common-law tort claims and small claims court provide additional damages remedies.

Are city tenant protection ordinances stronger?

Yes. San Jose's Tenant Protection Ordinance, Mountain View's CSFRA, and Cupertino's tenant protection rules each list specific harassment acts and impose larger administrative fines than state Civil Code §1940.2 allows.

Want to add a third city?

Use our full comparison tool to compare up to three cities.

Open Comparison Tool