Redding's Zoning Code (RMC Β§18.40.180) regulates fence height, location, and materials, but private boundary-fence disputes are governed by California Civil Code Β§841 - the Good Neighbor Fence Act of 2013. Section 841 presumes adjoining landowners share equally the responsibility and cost of a partition fence and requires 30 days' written notice with cost estimate, scope, and timeline before building or repairing. Disputes are heard in Shasta County Superior Court, not at City Hall.
Redding takes the standard California approach: the City enforces public zoning rules (height, location, materials, permits) while private property-line and cost-sharing disputes between neighbors are governed by state law and the courts. California Civil Code Β§841 (the Good Neighbor Fence Act of 2013) sets the framework. Subdivision (b)(1) creates a rebuttable presumption that 'adjoining landowners are presumed to share an equal benefit from any fence dividing their properties and, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in a written agreement, shall be presumed to be equally responsible for the reasonable costs of construction, maintenance, or necessary replacement.' Subdivision (b)(2) requires that before commencing work, a landowner intending to use Β§841 must give the adjoining owner 30 days' prior written notice describing the problem, the proposed solution, the estimated cost, the proposed cost-sharing approach, and the proposed timeline. If the adjoining owner disputes the presumption, they can rebut it by showing (A) the costs would be substantially disproportionate to the benefit, (B) it would impose undue financial hardship, (C) the proposed fence is unnecessary, or (D) other equitable considerations. The City of Redding will issue a Β§18.40.180 fence permit to either neighbor for a fence on or near the boundary line without resolving who 'owns' the line - that determination is made by survey and, if contested, by Shasta County Superior Court using adverse possession (5-year continuous use under tax payment, Code Civ. Proc. Β§325) or boundary-by-acquiescence doctrines. A neighbor who builds a fence over your line commits civil trespass. California recognizes 'spite fence' claims under Civil Code Β§841.4 - a fence over 10 feet built maliciously to annoy a neighbor is a private nuisance even if it otherwise complies with the local zoning code.
Zoning violations are enforced by the City under Β§18.40.180. Private trespass, partition-fence cost-sharing, and spite-fence claims are heard in Shasta County Superior Court. Civil Code Β§841.4 spite-fence remedies include abatement and damages. Civil Code Β§841 cost-sharing disputes are typically heard in small claims (under $12,500) or limited civil court.
Redding, CA
Redding does not impose an absolute numerical cap on the number of dogs or cats per household. Title 7 of the Redding Municipal Code regulates licensing, vac...
Redding, CA
Redding does not have a dedicated wildlife-feeding ordinance, but feeding wildlife in ways that draw nuisance conditions is reachable under Zoning Ordinance ...
Redding, CA
Redding does not have a dedicated animal-hoarding ordinance but addresses hoarding through (1) Zoning Ordinance Section 18.43.040(G), which prohibits keeping...
Redding, CA
Redding Zoning Ordinance Section 18.43.040(I) provides that the keeping of exotic or wild animals may be permitted only subject to issuance of a site develop...
Redding, CA
Redding Zoning Ordinance Section 18.43.040 expressly contemplates that hen chickens and bees may be allowed within urban environments to the extent that they...
Redding, CA
Redding does not have a breed-specific dog ordinance and cannot enact one. California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 expressly preempts local breed...
See how Redding's neighbor fence rules rules stack up against other locations.
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.