San Francisco, CA Rental Property Rules: Just Cause Eviction (2026)
Just cause eviction rules in San Francisco, CA, sometimes called tenant protection or "for cause" eviction ordinances, list the specific legal reasons a landlord can end a tenancy.
Key Facts
- Governing law
- Admin. Code § 37.9(a)
- Effective since
- August 24, 1980
- Enforcing body
- SF Rent Board
- Applies to
- All Rent Ordinance rental units
- Scope of bar
- Any endeavor to recover possession
Summary
San Francisco has required just cause for evictions since August 24, 1980. Administrative Code Section 37.9(a) says a landlord shall not endeavor to recover possession of a covered rental unit unless one of its listed grounds exists, so even attempting an eviction without a qualifying reason violates the Rent Ordinance. The San Francisco Rent Board administers the rule citywide, on top of whatever state law provides.
A landlord shall not endeavor to recover possession of a rental unit unless: (1) The tenant: (A) Has failed to pay the rent to which the landlord is lawfully entitled under the oral or written agreement between the tenant and landlord... (B) Habitually pays the rent late; or (C) Gives checks which are frequently returned because there are insufficient funds in the checking account
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: 2026 S-96: Codes: last updated to include changes made by legislation through Ordinance 133-26, File No. 260686, approved July 23, 2026, effective August 23, 2026).
Full Breakdown
9(a) does real work. It bars a landlord from any endeavor to recover possession, which reaches the attempt itself, not only a completed eviction. The section then lists the only grounds that qualify. The first, in subsection (a)(1)(A), is failure to pay the rent to which the landlord is lawfully entitled under the oral or written agreement between the tenant and landlord. That phrasing matters in both directions: an oral agreement counts the same as a written lease, and only rent the landlord is lawfully entitled to can support the eviction.
Subsection (a)(1)(B) covers a tenant who habitually pays the rent late. The word habitually points to a pattern of late payments rather than an isolated one. Subsection (a)(1)(C) covers checks which are frequently returned because there are insufficient funds in the checking account, again describing repetition rather than a single bounced check. 9(a) also lists lease violations, nuisance, illegal use, refusal to renew a similar lease, owner move-in, capital improvements, demolition, and condo conversion under the Ellis Act among the permitted causes. The protection applies even where a rental agreement or lease is silent on term, so a tenant does not lose it just because the lease never says how the tenancy ends. 9 for every rental unit covered by the Rent Ordinance.
Violations & Fines
Landlords who endeavor to recover possession without a Section 37.9(a) just cause face Rent Board proceedings, wrongful-eviction liability, and defenses raised in unlawful detainer actions brought by the City Attorney or the tenant.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a San Francisco landlord evict without a reason?
Is one late rent payment enough to evict me?
Does the just-cause rule apply to oral rental agreements?
Who enforces San Francisco's just-cause rule?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in San Francisco
California rules heatmap·Compare San Francisco to another location·View the California rental property rules overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.