Berkeley, CA Rental Property Rules: Source-of-Income Discrimination (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing chapter
- BMC Ch. 13.31
- Criminal fine
- Up to $1,000, or 6 months jail
- Civil damages
- 3x actual/general damages or 3x rent
- Statutory penalty
- $200-$400 plus fees
- Filing deadline
- 1 year from violation
- Adopted
- Ord. 7568-NS, 2017
Summary
Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 13.31 makes it unlawful for landlords to refuse rentals, deny units, or use income screening standards that discriminate against tenants paying with Section 8 vouchers or other housing assistance. Violators face criminal misdemeanor charges plus treble civil damages.
It shall be unlawful for any person offering for rent or lease, renting, leasing, or listing any housing accommodation... to do or attempt to do any of the following: A. Refuse to rent or lease a housing accommodation... on the basis of source of income... D. To use a financial or income standard for rental housing that: 1. Privileges income earned directly by the tenant... over housing assistance. 2. Discounts or discriminates against housing assistance payments... E. Criminal penalty. 1. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor... punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for a period not exceeding six months, or both.
Official source re-checked September 8, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: current through Ordinance 8031-NS, passed July 28, 2026).
Full Breakdown
020 bars landlords, agents, and employees from refusing to rent, serving termination notices, or filing unlawful detainer actions based on a prospective or current tenant's source of income, which the chapter defines broadly to include Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing vouchers, and any other lawful federal, state, local or nonprofit rental assistance. Landlords also cannot advertise a unit as unavailable to voucher holders when it is actually available, or apply different rental terms based on income source. Subsection D specifically outlaws financial screening standards that privilege a tenant's direct earnings over a housing subsidy, discount assistance payments when calculating qualifying income, or refuse to aggregate the combined income of co-tenants and cosigners the way a landlord would for married applicants.
010 note Berkeley administers the Housing Choice Voucher and VASH programs and found more than 300 low-income, senior, and disabled residents who could afford market rent if landlords accepted their vouchers. The chapter was adopted because Government Code § 12955(p)(1) leaves voucher holders unprotected under state law, per Sabi v. 4th 916, so Berkeley enacted its own local prohibition rather than relying on state civil rights law alone.
Violations & Fines
A violation is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or up to six months in county jail. Separately, any aggrieved tenant can bring a civil suit for triple actual and general damages, or, for a rental denial, triple one month's rent for the unit, plus a court-ordered penalty between $200 and $400, attorney's fees, and costs. Each violated provision and each instance of violation supports a separate civil action, and courts may issue injunctions sought by the tenant, county counsel, the district attorney, or a qualifying advocacy organization. Suits must be filed within one year of the violation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a Berkeley landlord refuse a Section 8 voucher?
Can a landlord require the tenant to earn the rent without counting a voucher?
What can a Berkeley tenant recover if a landlord discriminates by income source?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Berkeley
California rules heatmap·Compare Berkeley to another location·View the California rental property rules overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.