Saint Paul, MN Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Trigger
- designation as dangerous or potentially dangerous
- Who implants
- a licensed veterinarian, per Sec. 200.15
- Fee
- owner pays vet's microchip + registration fee
- Records kept by
- Dept. of Safety and Inspections
- General pets
- no citywide microchip mandate
Summary
Saint Paul doesn't microchip pets generally, but once a dog is declared 'dangerous' the owner must have a veterinarian implant a microchip under Legislative Code Sec. 200.15, pay the implant and registration fee, and keep the identification on file with the Department of Safety and Inspections.
The owner of a dangerous dog is required to have a microchip installed or injected on the animal. The microchip shall be installed in or injected under the skin of the animal by a licensed veterinarian and shall be designed so that, when scanned by an electronic reader, it is capable of providing the identification of the dog's owner. An appropriate fee shall be paid by the owner to the licensed veterinarian for the microchip and the registration of the dangerous dog. The identification of the owner and residence shall be maintained on file at the department of safety and inspections.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code of Ordinances: Supplement 133 Update 1).
Full Breakdown
15 requires that 'the owner of a dangerous dog is required to have a microchip installed or injected on the animal,' performed by a licensed veterinarian and designed so an electronic reader can identify the dog's owner when scanned. The owner pays 'an appropriate fee' to the veterinarian covering both the microchip and the dangerous-dog registration, and the department of safety and inspections keeps the owner's and residence's identification on file. The requirement reaches further up the chain: Sec. 11(a) states that once an animal is determined to be Potentially Dangerous it must be microchipped, before any additional conditions like an obedience class or restraint requirements are imposed, and Sec.
121(a)(6) lists microchip proof among the mandatory conditions a declared-dangerous dog's owner must show before the animal can be reclaimed from impoundment. Because the requirement attaches to the dangerous or potentially dangerous designation rather than to dog or cat ownership generally, an ordinary licensed pet in Saint Paul carries no microchip mandate, only its dog license under Sec. 02, rabies tag under Chapter 199, and, if applicable, collar/leash equipment under Sec. 16. Owners of regulated exotic animals face a related but separate microchip-reporting duty for animals that already carry one, or that are later sedated, under Sec. 055(d).
Violations & Fines
An owner of a declared dangerous or potentially dangerous dog who hasn't produced microchip proof is not in compliance with the conditions in Sec. 200.121(a) or Sec. 200.11(a), which under Sec. 200.121(b) authorizes Animal Control to seize the dog within 14 days of notice. Reclaiming a seized dangerous dog under Sec. 200.121(c) requires presenting proof that every condition, including microchipping, has been fulfilled, plus impounding and boarding fees.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do all dogs in Saint Paul need a microchip?
Who pays for the required microchip?
What if my dog is declared dangerous but doesn't have a chip?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Saint Paul
Compare Saint Paul to another location·View the Minnesota animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.