Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Saint Paul, MN Animal Ordinances: Breed Restrictions (2026)

Significant Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified September 2026

Key Facts

Breed factor
none: declarations are conduct-based only
Dangerous-animal triggers
substantial harm, repeat bites, dogfighting evidence
Potentially-dangerous triggers
unprovoked bite, chase, or attack history
Appeal window
14 days to request a hearing
Hearing fee
$50 to request, up to $1,000 if upheld

Summary

Saint Paul has no dog-breed ban. Legislative Code Sec. 200.01 defines 'dangerous animal' and 'potentially dangerous animal' purely by conduct, unprovoked bites, attacks or aggressive history, and Sec. 200.11 and 200.12 let the animal services manager declare any dog dangerous based on that behavior, regardless of breed.

Dangerous animal means an animal which has: (1)Without provocation caused substantial bodily harm to any person on public or private property; or(2)Without provocation engaged in any attack on any person under circumstances which would indicate danger to personal safety; or(3)Exhibited unusually aggressive behavior, such as an attack on another animal causing serious injury or death; or(4)Bitten one (1) or more persons on two (2) or more occasions; or(5)Been found to be potentially dangerous and/or the owner has personal knowledge of the same, and the animal aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals; or(6)Fresh wounds, scarring, or is observed in a fight, or has other indications which to a reasonable person evidence that the animal has been or will be used, trained or encouraged to fight with another animal; or whose owner has in custody or possession any training apparatus, paraphernalia or drugs used to prepare such animal to be fought with another animal.

Source: Municode Library - Saint PaulView official code

Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code of Ordinances: Supplement 133 Update 1).

Full Breakdown

Under Sec. 01, a 'dangerous animal' is one that, without provocation, has caused substantial bodily harm to a person; engaged in an attack indicating danger to personal safety; shown unusually aggressive behavior such as an attack on another animal causing serious injury or death; bitten one or more persons on two or more occasions; already been found potentially dangerous and gone on to aggressively bite, attack or endanger safety; or shows fresh fight wounds, scarring, or evidence, including training paraphernalia in the owner's possession, that it has been or will be used to fight another animal.

A 'potentially dangerous animal' is one that, unprovoked, has bitten a person or domestic animal, chased or approached someone in an apparent attitude of attack, or has a known history or tendency to attack while unprovoked. Breed is never mentioned in either definition. Under Sec. 11, the animal services manager designates a dog potentially dangerous after reviewing evidence, notifies the owner in writing, and may impose conditions such as an obedience class, a leash no longer than six feet with a muzzle, proof of rabies vaccination, and a declared-animal license.

Under Sec. 12, a full 'dangerous' designation follows the same notice-and-hearing process before the department of safety and inspections hearing officer, with a $50 fee to request a hearing and, if upheld, hearing costs up to $1,000 charged to the owner. An owner has 14 days to appeal either determination.

Violations & Fines

Failing to comply with imposed conditions after a dangerous or potentially dangerous declaration lets Animal Control seize the dog under Sec. 200.11(c) or Sec. 200.121(b). A hearing officer who upholds a dangerous declaration may order destruction under Sec. 200.12(c) if the attack was vicious, unprovoked or repeated, or if the owner has shown an inability to control the animal. Missing the 14-day appeal window under Sec. 200.17 forfeits the right to certiorari review.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Saint Paul ban specific dog breeds like pit bulls?
No. Sec. 200.01 defines 'dangerous animal' and 'potentially dangerous animal' entirely by an animal's own conduct, unprovoked bites, attacks or a documented history of aggression, with no reference to breed anywhere in the definitions. Any dog of any breed can be declared dangerous, and no breed is automatically banned or restricted.
What makes a dog 'potentially dangerous' versus 'dangerous'?
Under Sec. 200.01, 'potentially dangerous' covers an unprovoked bite, an unprovoked chase or approach in an apparent attack posture, or a known tendency to attack. 'Dangerous' is more severe: substantial bodily harm, a dangerous unprovoked attack, two or more bites, or evidence of dogfighting under Sec. 200.12.
Can I appeal a dangerous dog declaration?
Yes. Sec. 200.11 and Sec. 200.12 give the owner 14 days from written notice to request a hearing before the department of safety and inspections hearing officer, for a $50 administrative fee. If the declaration is upheld, hearing costs up to $1,000 become the owner's responsibility under Sec. 200.12(b)(1)d.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Saint Paul

All Saint Paul rules

How Saint Paul compares: Cities with No Dog Breed Restrictions·Compare Saint Paul to another location·View the Minnesota animal ordinances overview

Get notified when Breed Restrictions in Saint Paul, MN changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.