Farmington Hills' September 2023 ordinance effectively requires host presence for all newly initiated STRs through the owner-occupied / primary-residence requirement. Lawful new STRs after September 2023 must be in dwellings the owner uses as their permanent primary residence, verified at registration and at each 3-year Certificate of Compliance renewal. While the ordinance does not require the host to be physically present at every moment of every rental, the host must genuinely reside at the property and cannot consistently leave the dwelling vacant of the host while paying guests occupy it as a de facto whole-house rental. The framework permits hosted home-share operation (rented bedrooms or ADUs while the host occupies the rest of the dwelling) and short hosted absences (host vacation during which guests occupy the dwelling), but is incompatible with the absentee-investor whole-house operating model. Pre-September-2023 grandfathered non-owner-occupied STRs operate without a host-presence requirement through the 5-year amortization sunset (approx. September 2028).
The Farmington Hills September 2023 ordinance does not codify a continuous-host-presence requirement (the host need not be physically inside the dwelling at every moment of every rental), but the owner-occupied / primary-residence requirement functions as an effective host-presence rule for all newly initiated STRs. Under Chapter 34 (Zoning) as amended by Zoning Text Amendment 3, 2023, lawful new STR operation requires the dwelling to be the host's permanent primary residence; the host's residence at the property is verified at initial registration through documentation including Michigan driver's license at the property address, two or more utility bills in the host's name, voter registration, and vehicle registration, and is re-verified at each 3-year Certificate of Compliance renewal through reinspection and updated documentation. The framework permits two primary operating models. First, hosted home-share operation: the host occupies the dwelling as their primary residence and rents one or more bedrooms (or an accessory dwelling unit if the property has one) to paying guests while the host remains in the dwelling. This is the classic 'spare room Airbnb' model and is fully consistent with the owner-occupied designation. Second, short hosted-absence operation: the host occupies the dwelling as their primary residence but takes occasional short absences (a vacation, business trip, family visit) during which paying guests occupy the whole dwelling. Provided these absences are genuinely short and infrequent, and the host's primary-residence indicia (driver's license, utility bills, voter registration, vehicle registration, mailing address) remain at the property, this pattern is consistent with the owner-occupied designation. What the framework does not permit is the absentee-investor model: a property owner who genuinely resides elsewhere (a separate home or a different rented apartment) using the Farmington Hills dwelling exclusively as a paid rental, even if the owner occasionally visits or 'check-ins.' That pattern is non-owner-occupied STR operation, prohibited in residential districts as a 'Motel' use under the revised Chapter 34 Article 2 Section 2.2 definition. The September 2023 ordinance does separately require designation of a local contact (24-hour reachable, with name and phone number) if the host is away from the property during any rental period; the local contact requirement is a complementary control rather than a true host-presence rule, allowing the city to reach a responsible party for emergencies, noise complaints, or code issues. Pre-September-2023 registered non-owner-occupied STRs operating under the 5-year amortization window (through approximately September 2028) do not have a host-presence requirement; they may operate as full absentee-investor STRs through the sunset. After the sunset they too must convert to owner-occupied (and thus to the implicit host-presence framework) or cease. House Bill 4722 of 2021, which would have preempted host-presence-style requirements, never passed the Michigan Senate; successor HB 5438 of 2024 remains in committee as of 2026.
The host-presence framework is enforced principally through the owner-occupied / primary-residence verification regime under Chapter 34 and Chapter 9. Failure to maintain genuine primary residence at the property - documented by consistent host absence, conflicting primary-residence indicia (driver's license, utility bills, voter registration showing a different address), neighbor complaints, or evidence the host actually resides elsewhere - can result in reclassification of the dwelling as an unlawful non-owner-occupied STR. Reclassification triggers cease-and-desist under Chapter 34 (the property is then treated as 'Motel' use not permitted in residential districts) and revocation of the Certificate of Compliance under Chapter 9. Continued operation after cease-and-desist is a civil infraction with escalating per-day fines, referrable for injunctive relief in 47th District Court. Misrepresentation on the registration application (false claim of primary residence) is a separate civil infraction and can compound the consequences. Failure to designate a 24-hour-reachable local contact, or designation of an unreachable or non-responsive contact, is a Chapter 9 housing code violation cited at inspection and can result in non-renewal of the Certificate. Operators using property management firms or unaffiliated local contacts should ensure those contacts can actually respond within a short timeframe to emergencies and complaints; absent or non-responsive contacts are a frequent driver of non-renewal at the 3-year mark. The framework does not preclude legitimate short hosted absences (host vacation, business trip), but operators should document their continued primary-residence status to defend against reclassification.
Other ordinances people look up for this city. Green dot = verified primary-source excerpt.
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills does not prohibit artificial turf on residential, commercial, or institutional property. Michigan has no statewide artificial-turf or non-fu...
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills does not mandate native plants in private landscapes, but actively encourages native and Michigan-adapted species through the City's Reduce ...
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills does not designate dedicated food-truck vending zones. Food trucks may operate from private property with the owner's written consent (subje...
Farmington Hills, MI
Operating a food truck in Farmington Hills requires (1) a Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) Mobile Food Establishment or Speci...
Farmington Hills, MI
Federal and Michigan state law preempt almost all local drone regulation in Farmington Hills. Under the Michigan Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act (Act 436 of 20...
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills does not require a Special Event Permit or City business license for a residential garage / yard sale at a private residence. The City Clerk...
See how Farmington Hills's host presence rule rules stack up against other locations.
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.