Shasta County, CA Animal Ordinances: Breed Restrictions (2026)
Key Facts
- Breed-specific rules
- None; individualized conduct standard
- Governing state law
- Food & Agr. Code § 31601 et seq.
- Who investigates
- Animal regulation officer
- Hearing authority
- County administrative officer
- Decision deadline
- 30 days after hearing
- Added cost
- Annual recordkeeping fee for flagged dogs
Summary
Shasta County does not ban or single out any dog breed; instead it adopts the state's individualized dangerous-and-vicious-dog process under the Food and Agricultural Code. A dog of any breed can be declared potentially dangerous or vicious only after an animal regulation officer's investigation and a formal hearing before the county administrative officer.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 14 of the Food and Agricultural Code (Food & Agr. Code, § 31601 et seq.) are adopted and incorporated herein by reference. B. An administrative hearing to determine whether a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious shall be initiated and proceed in the following manner: 1. If an animal regulation officer has investigated and determined that there exists probable cause to believe a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, the supervisor of the sheriff's office animal regulation unit ... shall file a petition with the county administrative officer or his/her designee for a hearing to determine whether the dog in question should be declared potentially dangerous or vicious.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code: Supplement 22).
Full Breakdown
040 incorporates Chapter 9, Division 14 of the state Food and Agricultural Code (beginning at Section 31601) by reference for determining whether a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, meaning the county's rules apply to any dog's conduct rather than its breed. When an animal regulation officer finds probable cause that a dog is potentially dangerous or vicious, the supervisor of the sheriff's animal regulation unit, or the contract agency's chief executive officer, files a petition with the county administrative officer for a hearing. Petitions and hearings follow the timing and procedures set in state Food and Agricultural Code Sections 31621 through 31623, and the hearing officer can subpoena witnesses and documents, swear testimony, and record the proceedings.
The county administrative officer must issue a written determination and any orders within 30 days of the hearing, mailed or personally served on the owner. A dog found potentially dangerous or vicious is flagged on the animal regulation unit's records, and its owner pays an added annual recordkeeping fee on top of standard licensing and permit fees. Either the petitioner or the dog's owner can appeal an adverse determination as provided under the Food and Agricultural Code, and sanctions imposed on dogs before this ordinance's enactment remain in effect.
Violations & Fines
The county's dangerous-dog process itself does not set a fine schedule; consequences flow from the state Food and Agricultural Code orders issued after a hearing, which can include restraint, confinement, liability insurance, or euthanasia conditions, and an owner who ignores a resulting order or fails to pay the added annual fee for a designated dog is subject to enforcement under Chapter 6.04's general penalty provisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Shasta County ban pit bulls or other specific dog breeds?
How does a dog get declared potentially dangerous or vicious in Shasta County?
Can a dog owner appeal a dangerous dog designation?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Shasta County
How Shasta County compares: Cities with No Dog Breed Restrictions·California rules heatmap·Compare Shasta County to another location·View the California animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.