Sonoma County has no breed-specific legislation. California Food & Agricultural Code §31683 prohibits any local ordinance from declaring a specific breed potentially dangerous or vicious. Sonoma County instead regulates individual dogs on a behavior basis under Chapter 5, Articles regulating potentially dangerous and vicious dogs.
Sonoma County does not maintain a list of restricted, banned, or prohibited dog breeds. California law preempts local breed-specific bans: California Food & Agricultural Code §31683 expressly bars cities and counties from adopting any program that declares a dog potentially dangerous or vicious based solely on its breed. Local agencies may adopt sterilization and registration requirements that target specific breeds, but they cannot ban ownership of any breed outright. Sonoma County instead regulates dogs individually under Chapter 5 of the County Code. A 'potentially dangerous dog' is one that, on two separate occasions within the preceding 36-month period, has engaged in behavior without provocation that required defensive action to prevent bodily injury, or has killed or seriously injured a domestic animal off the owner's property. A 'vicious dog' is one that, in a single unprovoked incident, inflicts severe injury or death on a person, or that has been previously declared potentially dangerous and again engages in dangerous behavior. After a written complaint, Sonoma County Animal Services investigates and may hold an administrative hearing under California Food & Agricultural Code §31621. Potentially dangerous dogs face enclosure, leash/muzzle, posting, and re-registration requirements; vicious-dog determinations can result in mandatory euthanasia under §31645. Section 5-126 of the County Code separately prohibits keeping any dog as a public nuisance.
Owners of dogs determined to be potentially dangerous or vicious face mandatory restrictions including secure enclosure, leashing and muzzling when off the property, special licensing, warning signs on the property, and annual re-registration fees. Violating an enclosure/control order can lead to misdemeanor charges, dog impoundment, and — in vicious-dog cases — court-ordered destruction of the animal under California Food & Agricultural Code §31645. Restitution to bite victims and civil liability under California Civil Code §3342 (strict liability for dog bites) are independent of any criminal or administrative outcome.
Other ordinances people look up for this city. Green dot = verified primary-source excerpt.
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma Code Ch. 10.68 (Alcohol-Related Nuisance Ordinance) supplements general noise standards for parties involving alcohol. Property owners and hosts may...
Petaluma, CA
Leaf blowers and other power lawn equipment fall under Petaluma's general noise standards (IZO §21.040) and construction-hour standards. Use outside permitte...
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma Code §11.44.040 establishes two-hour street parking in posted downtown zones, applicable 8 a.m.–6 p.m. Monday through Saturday (excluding Sundays an...
Petaluma, CA
Commercial filming on public property or rights-of-way in Petaluma requires a film permit through the City's Film Permitting process, typically administered ...
Petaluma, CA
Drone operation in Petaluma is regulated primarily by FAA Part 107 and Part 89. Petaluma Municipal Airport (O69) imposes a controlled-airspace restriction wi...
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma adopts the California Building Code seismic provisions via PMC §17.04.020. The Historic Downtown Sprinkler Ordinance and seismic standards apply to ...
Side-by-side rule comparisons with other cities in Sonoma County.
See how other cities in Sonoma County handle breed restrictions.
See how Petaluma's breed restrictions rules stack up against other locations.
Quick Compare
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.