Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Minnetonka, MN Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)

Some Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified October 2026

Key Facts

Citation
Minnetonka City Code § 925.105, paragraph 3(a)(3)
Who must microchip
Owners of potentially dangerous animals
Species covered
Any animal, because animal replaces dog
Leash limit off premises
Six feet in length
Who determines status
Authorized city personnel, with hearing officer review
Default penalty tier
Petty misdemeanor under § 925.120

Summary

In the City of Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the City Code requires a microchip identification implanted in any animal found potentially dangerous. Section 925.105 adopts Minn. Stat. §§ 347.50 through 347.56 by reference and substitutes the word animal for dog, so the rule reaches every species, not only dogs.

1. Adoption of statute. The provisions of Minn. Stat. §§ 347.50 through 347.56 are adopted by reference and govern dangerous animals in the city of Minnetonka, except that the word "animal" is substituted for the word "dog" wherever it appears in those statutes. ... 3. Potentially dangerous animals. a. A person who owns, keeps, possesses, or acts as a custodian for a potentially dangerous animal must do the following: ... (3) have a microchip identification implanted in the animal as required by Minn. Stat. §347.515; and (4) provide notification of the death, change in ownership, or transfer of the animal in accordance with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §347.52(c) and (f).

Full Breakdown

Section 925.105 is the dangerous animal rule in the Minnetonka City Code, and it holds the only microchip requirement in the code. Paragraph 1 adopts Minn. Stat. §§ 347.50 through 347.56 by reference for the City of Minnetonka and swaps the word "animal" in for "dog" wherever it appears in those statutes, so cats and other species fall under the same scheme. Authorized city personnel decide whether an animal is dangerous or potentially dangerous. A request for a hearing on that decision is referred to an independent hearing officer, and an aggrieved party can seek judicial review of the hearing officer's decision in court.

The microchip duty sits in paragraph 3 and applies once an animal is labeled potentially dangerous. The person who owns, keeps, possesses, or acts as custodian must have a microchip identification implanted in the animal as required by Minn. Stat. §347.515, and must give notice of the animal's death, a change in ownership, or a transfer in line with Minn. Stat. §347.52(c) and (f). The same paragraph requires a leash not exceeding six feet in length whenever the animal is off the owner's premises. On the owner's premises the animal must be confined within a fenced enclosure sufficient to keep it in, or held on a leash or chain not exceeding six feet. The notice and hearing steps in Minn. Stat. §347.541 apply to the potentially dangerous determination.

A dangerous animal carries heavier duties under paragraph 2, including a proper enclosure with sidewalls at least five feet high, posts buried at least 18 inches, and a lock whenever the enclosure is occupied. Paragraph 4 lets city personnel who witness an attack use whatever means they deem appropriate to end it. The paragraph on potentially dangerous animals was amended by Ord. #2016-03, effective March 3, 2016.

Violations & Fines

Section 925.120 sets the tiers. A violation of section 925.105(1) and (2) is a misdemeanor. The microchip duty is in paragraph 3, which is not on that list, so it falls under the default: unless otherwise designated, a violation of any other provision in the chapter is a petty misdemeanor. A violation preceded by two or more of the chapter's petty misdemeanor violations within 12 months of the present violation is a misdemeanor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the City of Minnetonka require microchips for every dog and cat?
The City Code mentions a microchip in one place only, the potentially dangerous animal paragraph of section 925.105. Nothing in that section ties a microchip to ordinary pets. The duty attaches after authorized city personnel determine that an animal is potentially dangerous under the adopted Minnesota statutes.
Does the microchip rule cover cats and other animals, or only dogs?
It covers any animal. Section 925.105(1) adopts Minn. Stat. §§ 347.50 through 347.56 for the City of Minnetonka and substitutes the word animal for the word dog wherever it appears in those statutes, so the potentially dangerous process is not limited to dogs.
Who decides that an animal is potentially dangerous in Minnetonka?
Authorized city personnel make the determination. A request for a hearing on it is referred to an independent hearing officer, and an aggrieved party can obtain judicial review of the hearing officer's decision. The notice and hearing requirements in Minn. Stat. §347.541 apply to the potentially dangerous finding.
What else must the owner of a potentially dangerous animal do besides microchipping?
Keep the animal on a leash not exceeding six feet whenever it is off the owner's premises. On the premises, confine it in a fenced enclosure sufficient to keep it from leaving, or keep it on a leash or chain not exceeding six feet. Give notice of its death, a change of ownership, or a transfer.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Minnetonka

All Minnetonka rules

Compare Minnetonka to another location·View the Minnesota animal ordinances overview

Get notified when Microchipping in Minnetonka, MN changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.

Microchipping in Nearby Cities

How other cities in Hennepin County handle microchipping.

Minneapolis, MN
Light Restrictions