Clackamas County, OR Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Universal chip mandate
- None; no county-wide requirement
- Mandatory trigger
- Dangerous dog classification, Code 5.01.050(C)(3)
- Discretionary trigger
- Hearings Officer order, Code 5.01.080(B)(1)(h)
- Who pays
- Dog owner, at Dog Services
- State authority
- ORS 609.168
- Survives declassification
- Yes, permanently
Summary
Clackamas County doesn't microchip every dog, but Code 5.01.080(B)(1)(h) lets a Hearings Officer order microchip identification as a condition for any Chapter 5.01 violation, and Code 5.01.050(C)(3)-(4) makes it mandatory once a dog is classified dangerous. Either way, the chip is implanted at Dog Services at the owner's own expense under ORS 609.168.
h. Require that the owner obtain microchip identification for the animal. ... 3. Regulation of Dangerous Dogs; Microchip Identification. When a dog has been classified as dangerous, the dog owner shall keep the dog in a secure enclosure ... the dog shall be microchip identified at Dog Services at the expense of the owner, as provided in ORS 609.168. ... a. Declassification. Following an owner's written request, the County may declassify a dog as dangerous and terminate the regulations ordered at the time of classification, except for microchip identification and secure enclosure, when the following conditions have been met.
Full Breakdown
Two separate hooks in the dog code can trigger a microchip requirement. First, Code 5.01.080(B)(1)(h) gives a Hearings Officer authority to order the owner obtain microchip identification for the animal as a condition attached to a finding on any violation of Chapter 5.01, not only a dangerous-dog case; this sits alongside other conditions the officer can impose, such as restitution, spay or neuter, surrendering the animal, or reducing the number of animals kept on the property. Second, Code 5.01.050(C)(3) makes microchipping mandatory the moment a dog is classified dangerous: the dog shall be microchip identified at Dog Services at the expense of the owner, as provided in ORS 609.168, alongside the secure-enclosure and muzzle-and-leash conditions. A dangerous-dog certificate of registration cannot be issued or renewed under 5.01.050(C)(4)(a) without proof of that microchip.
The microchip mandate outlasts the dangerous-dog classification itself. Under Code 5.01.050(C)(5)(a), an owner can ask the county to declassify a dog after two years with no further incidents and no violations of the imposed conditions, but that declassification terminates the regulations ordered at the time of classification, except for microchip identification and secure enclosure. In other words, once a dog has been chipped under this chapter, the chip and the enclosure requirement stay in place permanently, even if every other condition is lifted.
Violations & Fines
Failing to comply with a microchip order is treated the same as any other unmet Hearings Officer condition: the county may find the owner has failed to comply, which is itself citable, and can pursue fines, fees, costs and expenses under Code 5.01.080(A), plus any other condition reasonably designed to prevent a repeat violation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Clackamas County require every dog to be microchipped?
Who pays for the microchip and where is it done?
If my dog is later declassified as dangerous, do I still need the chip?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Clackamas County
Compare Clackamas County to another location·View the Oregon animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.