Kirkland, WA Privacy & Surveillance: Facial Recognition Ban (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing law
- KMC 11.94.060, added by Ordinance 4796 (2022)
- Who is bound
- All city officials, employees, and city vendors
- Exceptions
- Records redaction, personal devices, secure access, incidental software
- Enforcement
- Internal employee discipline, not a fine or infraction
- Purpose stated
- Protect resident and visitor privacy and civil liberties
Summary
Kirkland bans its own government from using facial recognition technology outright. City officials and employees cannot obtain, retain, possess, access, or use facial recognition software, or hire a vendor to do it on the city's behalf, under KMC 11.94.060, adopted by Ordinance 4796 in 2022 to protect resident privacy.
The city of Kirkland and any official or employee of the city shall not obtain, retain, possess, access, or use any facial recognition technology or enter into any agreement that authorizes any third party, on behalf of the city, to obtain, retain, possess, access, or use any facial recognition technology.
Official source re-checked September 8, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: current through Ordinance 4945, passed July 21, 2026).
Full Breakdown
Kirkland Municipal Code Chapter 11.94, Article II, flatly prohibits city government from using facial recognition technology. KMC 11.94.060 bars any city official or employee from obtaining, retaining, possessing, accessing, or using facial recognition technology, and blocks the city from contracting with a third-party vendor to run facial recognition on its behalf. The ban, added by Ordinance 4796 in 2022, was written because facial recognition systems are being developed for many public and private sector uses and raise concerns about accuracy, potential infringement on democratic freedoms, and discriminatory impact, as stated in KMC 11.94.050.
The prohibition is not absolute. KMC 11.94.070 carves out four narrow exceptions: automated redaction of public-records recordings under Chapter 42.56 RCW so long as no facial recognition data is generated or retained; personal use of facial recognition on privately owned consumer devices; biometric access control for secure building entry, provided any biometric identifiers are collected only with the subject's knowledge and consent, or for non-consenting persons only for security purposes under Chapter 19.375 RCW; and software that merely incorporates facial-recognition components without the city making any affirmative or intentional use of that function.
Enforcement runs through internal discipline rather than a civil infraction. KMC 11.94.020 states a violation of Chapter 11.94 is not punishable under the general penalty section, KMC 11.04.010(m), unless a section expressly says so; instead a city employee who breaks the rule may be subject to discipline under the city's disciplinary policies and any applicable collective bargaining agreement. The chapter sits alongside Kirkland's body-worn camera rules in Article III, which separately govern how police-worn cameras and their footage are managed.
Violations & Fines
Kirkland does not cite officers with a criminal or civil infraction for breaching the facial-recognition ban. Under KMC 11.94.020, a violation instead triggers internal city discipline under the employee's collective bargaining agreement and the city's own disciplinary policies, up to and including termination, rather than a court-imposed fine. The chapter creates no private right of action.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Kirkland police use facial recognition technology?
Are there any exceptions to Kirkland's facial recognition ban?
What happens to a city employee who violates the ban?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Kirkland
Compare Kirkland to another location·View the Washington privacy & surveillance overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.