Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Benton County, WA Right to Farm: Farm Nuisance Protection (2026)

Some Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified August 2026

Key Facts

Governing chapter
BCC 14.05, adopted by Ord. 403 (2004)
Coverage area
Unincorporated Benton County only
Core protection
Presumed reasonable, not a nuisance
Exception
Substantial adverse effect on public health/safety
Timing requirement
Activity must predate nonagricultural neighbors
Preserved remedy
Right to sue for damages unaffected
Predecessor law
Repealed 1990 right-to-farm Ordinance 231

Summary

Benton County Code Chapter 14.05 shields farming and forest practices in unincorporated areas from nuisance lawsuits. Activities that follow good agricultural practices and predate nearby non-farm uses are presumed reasonable and not a nuisance, unless they cause a substantial adverse effect on public health and safety.

These county ordinances apply to unincorporated areas of Benton County. Incorporated cities within the county may have their own rules that take precedence over county-level regulations.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, agricultural activities conducted on farmland and forest practices, if consistent with good agricultural practices and established prior to surrounding nonagricultural and nonforestry activities, are presumed to be reasonable and shall not be found to constitute a nuisance unless the activity has a substantial adverse effect on the public health and safety. If those agricultural activities and forest practices are undertaken in conformity with all applicable laws and rules, the activities are presumed to be good agricultural and forest practices not adversely affecting the public health and safety for purposes of BCC 14.05.040 and BCC 14.05.030. An agricultural activity that is in conformity with such laws and rules shall not be restricted as to the hours of the day or day or days of the week during which it may be conducted. Nothing in this BCC 14.05.040 shall affect or impair any right to sue for damages.

Full Breakdown

48 RCW. 020, the chapter reaches only the unincorporated areas of Benton County, so a farm operating inside Kennewick, Richland, West Richland or Prosser falls under that city's own code, not this chapter. 030 finds that farmland and forest practices in urbanizing areas are often hit with nuisance suits that force farmland out of production, and states the chapter's purpose as protecting those operations. 040: an agricultural activity or forest practice conducted on farmland, if consistent with good agricultural practices and established before the surrounding nonagricultural or nonforestry uses moved in, is presumed reasonable and cannot be found a nuisance unless it has a substantial adverse effect on public health and safety.

040, and a conforming activity cannot be restricted to particular hours or days. 050 defines the covered conduct broadly: roadside stands and farm markets, noise, odors, dust, fumes, operation of machinery and irrigation pumps, use of county road ditches and water for agricultural purposes, aerial and ground application of seed, fertilizer and plant protection products, labor use, roadway movement of equipment and livestock, wildlife damage protection, trespass prevention, and construction or maintenance of buildings, fences, roads, bridges, ponds and drains.

Violations & Fines

This chapter creates a legal presumption, not a permit or fine schedule, so there is no county penalty to trigger. The protection has one built-in limit: it does not apply if the agricultural activity causes a substantial adverse effect on public health and safety, and BCC 14.05.040 expressly states that nothing in the section impairs a neighbor's right to sue for damages. A farm operator who cannot show the activity followed good agricultural practices and predates the surrounding nonagricultural use loses the presumption in a nuisance suit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Benton County's right-to-farm chapter block all nuisance complaints against a farm?
No. BCC 14.05.040 presumes a qualifying agricultural or forest activity reasonable and not a nuisance, but that presumption drops away if the activity has a substantial adverse effect on public health and safety, and neighbors keep their right to sue for damages under the same section.
Does this protection apply inside Kennewick, Richland or Prosser?
No. BCC 14.05.020 limits the chapter to the unincorporated areas of Benton County. A farm within an incorporated city's limits is governed by that city's own municipal code, not Chapter 14.05 BCC.
What counts as a protected agricultural activity under the chapter?
BCC 14.05.050 defines it broadly to include roadside stands, noise, odors, dust, fumes, machinery and irrigation pump operation, use of road ditches and water, aerial or ground application of fertilizers and plant protection products, roadway movement of equipment and livestock, and building or fence maintenance tied to farming.
Can the county or a neighbor restrict farm hours because of the noise or dust?
Not if the activity conforms to applicable laws and rules. BCC 14.05.040 states a conforming agricultural activity or forest practice shall not be restricted as to the hours of the day or the days of the week during which it may be conducted.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Benton County

All Benton County rules

Compare Benton County to another location·View the Washington right to farm overview

Get notified when Farm Nuisance Protection in Benton County, WA changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.

Farm Nuisance Protection in Cities Across Benton County