Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Colorado Statewide Rule

Colorado officers may demand your name, but silence is not a crime

Light RestrictionsApplies statewide across Colorado (2026)

Key Facts

Governing statute
C.R.S. § 16-3-103, "Stopping of suspect"
What an officer may require
Name, address, identification if available, and an explanation of your actions
Social security number
An officer may not require a stopped person to produce or divulge it
Penalty for refusing
None. Colorado has no failure-to-identify offense, and § 18-8-104(1.5) bars an obstruction charge based on silence
Penalty for lying
Class 2 misdemeanor under § 18-8-111.5, up to 120 days and $750; class 6 felony if it substantially impedes a felony investigation
If you are driving
Class A traffic infraction under § 42-2-115 to refuse to hand over a license in your immediate possession
Frisk authority
Pat-down for weapons only where the officer reasonably suspects personal safety requires it, § 16-3-103(2)
Officer must identify too
Business card with name, division, precinct, and badge number after an uncited traffic stop, § 24-31-309(4)(a)
Last verified: September 2, 2026

Summary

Colorado writes the demand into statute and then declines to punish the refusal. C.R.S. § 16-3-103 lets a peace officer who reasonably suspects you of a crime stop you and require your name, your address, identification if you have it, and an explanation of your actions, and the same subsection forbids the officer from making you produce or divulge your social security number. No section of the Colorado Criminal Code makes it an offense to stay quiet, and since March 1, 2022 the obstruction statute has said in terms that you cannot be charged for remaining silent. What is chargeable is lying about who you are, and, if you are driving, refusing to hand over a license already in your pocket.

16-3-103. Stopping of suspect. (1) A peace officer may stop any person who he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime and may require him to give his name and address, identification if available, and an explanation of his actions. A peace officer shall not require any person who is stopped pursuant to this section to produce or divulge such person's social security number. The stopping shall not constitute an arrest. (2) When a peace officer has stopped a person for questioning pursuant to this section and reasonably suspects that his personal safety requires it, he may conduct a pat-down search of that person for weapons.

Full Breakdown

Section 16-3-103 sits in part 1 of article 3 of title 16 under the catchline "Stopping of suspect." It is Colorado's codification of the investigative detention: the officer needs reasonable suspicion that you are committing, have committed, or are about to commit a crime, and the section closes by saying that the stopping "shall not constitute an arrest." Subsection (2) allows a pat-down for weapons only when the officer, having already stopped you, "reasonably suspects that his personal safety requires it." The operative language has been unchanged since a 2001 amendment at L. 2001, p. 941, § 9.

What the section conspicuously does not carry is a penalty clause. Colorado never enacted a failure-to-identify or refusal-to-identify offense, and a full-text search of the Colorado Revised Statutes for those phrases returns nothing in the criminal code. The gap was then closed from the other direction by C.R.S. § 18-8-104(1.5), added by S.B. 21-271 and effective March 1, 2022: "A person shall not be charged with the offense described in subsection (1) of this section because the person remained silent or because the person stated a verbal opposition to an order by a government official." Obstructing a peace officer under § 18-8-104(1)(a) already required "using or threatening to use violence, force, physical interference, or an obstacle," so words alone never reached it; subsection (1.5) makes that explicit. Obstruction is a class 2 misdemeanor, which since March 1, 2022 carries up to 120 days in jail, a fine of not more than seven hundred fifty dollars, or both, under C.R.S. § 18-1.3-501(1)(a.5).

Giving a false answer is a different matter. C.R.S. § 18-8-111.5, also added by S.B. 21-271, makes it a class 2 misdemeanor to knowingly provide false identifying information to law enforcement authorities, rising to a class 6 felony where the false information results in substantially impeding the investigation or arrest of a person for a felony crime as defined in § 24-4.1-302(1). The statute defines "identifying information" narrowly: a person's name, address, birth date, social security number, or driver's license or Colorado identification number.

Drivers are the one group Colorado does compel. C.R.S. § 42-2-115 says a licensed driver who has the license, instruction permit, or identification card in immediate possession may not refuse to remove it from a billfold, purse, cover, or other container and hand it to an officer who reasonably suspects a violation of articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 of title 42. Violation is a class A traffic infraction. Note the two limits built into it: the duty attaches only to a document you actually have with you, and only where the officer suspects a title 42 vehicle offense. For suspected impaired driving, C.R.S. § 42-4-1302 mirrors § 16-3-103 and lets an officer require name, address, and an explanation, without mentioning identification at all.

The duty to identify also runs the other way in Colorado. Under C.R.S. § 24-31-309(4)(a), a certified peace officer must hand over a business card, without being asked, to any person detained in a traffic stop but not cited or arrested, carrying the officer's name, division, precinct, and badge or other identification number, a telephone number for comments, and information on how to file a complaint. Undercover operations are exempt. Subsection (3.5) of the same section, added by S.B. 20-217, requires an officer to have a legal basis for making any contact with a member of the public, consensual or not, and to report the reason for the contact, its duration, and its result to the employing agency.

Violations & Penalties

5) bars a Colorado prosecutor from charging obstruction because a person remained silent or voiced opposition to an order. 5, a class 2 misdemeanor punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to seven hundred fifty dollars, or a class 6 felony where the lie substantially impedes a felony investigation or arrest; obstructing a peace officer under § 18-8-104, also a class 2 misdemeanor, which requires violence, force, physical interference, or an obstacle; and, for drivers, a class A traffic infraction under § 42-2-115 for refusing to hand over a license in immediate possession.

Complaints about how a stop was conducted go to the employing agency through the business card the officer must supply under § 24-31-309(4)(a), and each agency must compile and publish the profiling allegations that come in that way, without naming officers or complainants, under § 24-31-309(4)(c).

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to give my name to a Colorado police officer?
An officer who reasonably suspects you of a crime is authorized by C.R.S. § 16-3-103 to require it, but Colorado attached no penalty to refusing. There is no failure-to-identify crime in the Colorado Criminal Code, and § 18-8-104(1.5) says you cannot be charged with obstructing a peace officer because you remained silent or stated verbal opposition to an order. If you are the driver of a vehicle and the officer suspects a title 42 offense, § 42-2-115 is different: you must hand over a license you have on you.
What happens if I give a false name in Colorado?
That is a separate offense. C.R.S. § 18-8-111.5 makes knowingly providing false identifying information to law enforcement a class 2 misdemeanor, punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a fine of up to seven hundred fifty dollars. It becomes a class 6 felony if the false information results in substantially impeding the investigation or arrest of someone for a felony. The statute covers a false name, address, birth date, social security number, or driver's license or Colorado identification number.
Can an officer demand my social security number during a stop?
No. C.R.S. § 16-3-103(1) contains an express bar: a peace officer "shall not require any person who is stopped pursuant to this section to produce or divulge such person's social security number." The number is still within the definition of identifying information in § 18-8-111.5, so giving a false one is an offense even though giving none is not.
Can they search or frisk me during a Colorado stop?
Only for weapons, and only on a further finding. Section 16-3-103(2) permits a pat-down after a stop when the officer "reasonably suspects that his personal safety requires it." That is narrower than a consent search, which is governed by C.R.S. § 16-3-310 and requires the officer to tell you first that you are being asked to consent and that you may refuse. Section 16-3-310(4) expressly excludes a § 16-3-103 frisk from the advisement requirement.
Does the officer have to tell me who they are?
In a traffic stop, yes, and without you asking. C.R.S. § 24-31-309(4)(a) requires a certified peace officer to give a business card to any person detained in a traffic stop but not cited or arrested, showing the officer's name, division, precinct, and badge or other identification number, plus a phone number for comments and information about filing a complaint. Authorized undercover operations are exempt under subsection (4)(b).

Sources

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.