Hawaii Statewide Rule
Hawaii Spite Fence and Boundary Fence Common Law
Key Facts
- Statute
- HRS 663-1
- Doctrine
- Common law nuisance
- Remedy
- Injunction and damages
- Forum
- Circuit or district court
Summary
Hawaii applies common law tort principles statewide under HRS 663-1, allowing neighbors to sue for spite fences and shared boundary fence cost recovery regardless of which county they live in.
§664-23 Hearing, order, kind of fence and markers, etc. [(a)] At the time set for the hearing of the petition[,] the court and the parties shall view the line of fence or proposed fence. The court shall decide equitably on the kind of fence to be built or maintained as circumstances or desired purposes may require and the portion or portions to be erected or maintained by either the respective land owners or any of the occupants or lessees of the particular parcels of land affected, insofar as their respective interests are concerned, or the share which each shall contribute to the cost thereof.
Full Breakdown
Hawaii Revised Statutes 663-1 establishes that all persons in the state are personally responsible in damages for trespass or injury to person or property. Hawaii courts have long applied common law to spite fence claims, where a fence built primarily to annoy a neighbor with no legitimate purpose can be enjoined or removed as a private nuisance. Hawaii has no statutory partition fence law equivalent to mainland states, so cost-sharing for boundary fences is governed by common law agreement and equity. These principles apply uniformly statewide.
Violations & Penalties
Property owners maintaining a spite fence may be sued for injunction (court-ordered removal) and damages. Punitive damages are available when malice is established under HRS 663 tort principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue a neighbor for a spite fence in Hawaii?
Does Hawaii require neighbors to split fence costs?
Sources
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.