Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

New Hampshire Statewide Rule

New Hampshire Sets No Season for Studded Tires

Few RestrictionsApplies statewide across New Hampshire (2026)

Key Facts

Studded tire season
None. No date window exists anywhere in New Hampshire statute or rule
Statutory silence
Full text search of the RSA returns 0 hits for "studded", "studs" and "snow tires"
Governing duty
RSA 266:48 requires tires in safe operating condition per requirements established by the Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles
Visual failure list
Four defects only: over-1-inch cut to the body cords or boot repair, separation bulge, exposed ply or cord, completely worn tread affecting traction (RSA 266:49)
Tread measurement
Gauge calibrated in thirty-seconds of an inch, major groove nearest centre, 2 points not closer than 15 inches (RSA 266:51)
Tire chains
No New Hampshire chain law, chain requirement or chain ban appears in the RSA
Metal-tired vehicles
A vehicle on solid rubber or cushion tires is capped at 10 mph by RSA 265:66, II
Inspection lane check
Gone. RSA 266:1 was repealed by 2025, 141:253, IV effective January 31, 2026
Last verified: September 2, 2026

Summary

New Hampshire is one of the northern states that never wrote a studded tire season into law. The words "studded," "studs" and "snow tires" return no hits at all in a full text search of the Revised Statutes Annotated, and the Department of Safety rules contain no stud provision either. What governs instead is the general tire duty in RSA 266:48: a motor vehicle or trailer may not be driven on the ways unless it is equipped with tires in safe operating condition in accordance with requirements established by the Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles, and no tire counts as safe unless it meets the visual and tread depth requirements of that subdivision. Studs are lawful in New Hampshire in July as much as in January, and there is no tire chain restriction either.

It shall be unlawful to drive a motor vehicle or trailer upon the ways unless such motor vehicle or trailer is equipped with tires in safe operating condition in accordance with requirements established by the director. No tire mounted on a motor vehicle or trailer shall be deemed to be in safe operating condition unless it meets the visual and tread depth requirements set forth in this subdivision. A spare tire shall not be deemed to be a "tire mounted on a motor vehicle or trailer" for the purposes of this subdivision.

Full Breakdown

The New Hampshire tire rules occupy seven consecutive sections of the vehicle equipment chapter, RSA 266:47 through 266:53, and it is worth naming what they do cover in order to see what they leave out. RSA 266:47 makes it unlawful to use or sell regrooved used passenger car tires. RSA 266:48 is the operative duty and the delegation. RSA 266:49 lists the four visual defects that put a tire out of safe driving condition: a fabric break or a cut over one inch measured on the outside and deep enough to reach the body cords, or a temporary repair by blowout patch or boot; any bump, bulge or knot related to separation or partial failure of the tire structure; any exposed ply or cord structure; and a portion of the tread design completely worn where the worn portion is large enough to affect traction and stopping ability. RSA 266:51 prescribes how tread depth is measured, with a gauge calibrated in thirty-seconds of an inch, read in a major tread groove nearest the centre at 2 points of the circumference not closer than 15 inches. RSA 266:53 exempts farm vehicles registered under RSA 261, self-propelled combines, self-propelled corn and hay harvesting machines, and tractors used exclusively for agriculture.

Nothing in that closed sequence mentions studs, metal projections, calendar dates or winter conditions. The only place metal reaches the road surface in New Hampshire law is definitional: RSA 259:54 defines a "metal tire" as every tire the surface of which in contact with the highway is wholly or partly of metal or other hard, nonresilient material, and RSA 266:50 says a vehicle is considered equipped with solid rubber, iron, steel or other hard tires when it has 2 or more of that kind. Those provisions bite on the vehicle class, not on a rubber tire carrying studs, and the consequence attached to them is a speed limit rather than a ban: RSA 265:66, II caps a vehicle equipped with solid rubber or cushion tires at 10 miles per hour.

The Department of Safety side is equally empty. The commissioner's motor vehicle rules at Saf-C 3200 carried a part on wheels and tires, and its list of prohibited tires at Saf-C 3211.04 was closed and short: a vehicle was rejected only if radial and bias-ply tires sat on the same axle, if different tire sizes sat on the same axle other than compatible US and metric sizes, or if the tires were marked "for farm use only", "off highway use only", or "racing only". Studs appear nowhere in that list, and the only occurrences of the word "stud" in the whole chapter refer to wheel bolts, nuts, studs or lugs being loose, missing or damaged.

One large change makes this page different from what it would have said a year ago. New Hampshire has abolished periodic motor vehicle inspection. RSA 266:1, the inspection requirement, is printed on the General Court site as "Repealed by 2025, 141:253, IV, eff. Jan. 31, 2026," and RSA 266:1-a, 266:1-b and 266:2 through 266:8 were repealed by the same act, with only the school bus inspection at RSA 266:7 surviving. Saf-C 3211 was adopted under the rulemaking authority of RSA 21-P:14, V(a) and RSA 266:1, so the inspection rejection criteria have lost the annual lane they were written for. The statutory duty in RSA 266:48 is unaffected: it binds the driver on the road, not the inspection station, and it is enforced roadside like any other equipment rule.

Practical effect for a New Hampshire driver: you may fit studded winter tires whenever you choose and leave them on year round, and no statute requires you to remove them by a spring date the way New York, Maine and several other snow states do. What you cannot do is run a worn or damaged tire. A stud pattern that has torn the tread, exposed cord, or left a completely worn area big enough to affect traction and stopping ability puts the tire outside RSA 266:49 whatever the season, and studs give no defence to that.

Violations & Penalties

RSA 266:48 states the duty in mandatory terms, that it "shall be unlawful" to drive on the ways without tires in safe operating condition, but it fixes no penalty, so the general provision applies: under RSA 651:2, IV(a) a violation carries a fine of no more than $1,000 for an individual, and RSA 106-L:10, I adds a penalty assessment of $2 or 24 percent of the fine, whichever is greater, on any fine for a violation of RSA title XXI. The working figure comes from the uniform fine schedule developed under RSA 502-A:19-b, V and printed on the "Notice of Fine, Division of Motor Vehicles" that accompanies the summons under RSA 262:44, I.

A tire charge is eligible for plea by mail, and the plea and payment must reach the Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles within 30 days of the date of the summons. A driver who lets that lapse is defaulted under RSA 262:44, III(a), pays an administrative processing fee on top, and has driving privileges suspended under RSA 263:56-a. There is no separate stud offence to be charged, and no seasonal offence, because New Hampshire has never created one.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can I put studded tires on in New Hampshire?
Any time. New Hampshire has no on-date and no off-date. The words "studded" and "studs" produce zero results in a full text search of the Revised Statutes Annotated, and the Department of Safety motor vehicle rules use "studs" only for wheel bolts. Unlike New York with its October to April window, the New Hampshire General Court simply never legislated on tire studs, so the only constraint on the tires you run is the safe condition duty in RSA 266:48.
Can I leave studs on year round?
Yes. Because there is no seasonal window in the statute, there is nothing that turns a lawful winter tire into an unlawful summer one. What can still catch you is condition: RSA 266:49 puts a tire out of safe driving condition if it has an exposed ply or cord structure, a bump, bulge or knot from separation, a cut over one inch deep enough to reach the body cords, or a completely worn area of tread design large enough to affect traction and stopping ability. Studs that have chewed the tread past that point are a violation in June exactly as in December.
Does New Hampshire have a chain law?
No. There is no provision requiring, permitting on condition, or prohibiting tire chains for traction anywhere in the Revised Statutes Annotated. The 15 sections that mention chains are about trailer breakaway safety chains under RSA 266:63, binder chains on vehicles carrying junk motor vehicles under RSA 266:69, wrecker safety chains under RSA 266:108, and restraint provisions outside title XXI. Traction devices are left to the driver.
Will studded tires fail a New Hampshire inspection?
There is no longer a general inspection to fail. RSA 266:1 is printed as "Repealed by 2025, 141:253, IV, eff. Jan. 31, 2026," and RSA 266:1-a through 266:8 went with it, leaving only the school bus inspection at RSA 266:7. When the inspection did exist, the rule listing prohibited tires, Saf-C 3211.04, named only mismatched radial and bias-ply tires on one axle, mismatched sizes on one axle, and tires marked for farm, off highway or racing use. Studs were never on that list.
How is a tire rule enforced now that inspections have ended?
Roadside. RSA 266:48 binds the driver on the ways, not the inspection station, so an officer can charge unsafe tires at a stop. There is no statutory fine in the section, so RSA 651:2, IV(a) caps it at $1,000 and the actual amount comes from the uniform fine schedule under RSA 502-A:19-b, V, delivered as the Notice of Fine described in RSA 262:44, I with a 30-day plea-by-mail deadline.
What tread depth do I need in New Hampshire?
The statute states the test qualitatively rather than numerically. RSA 266:49, IV puts a tire out of safe condition when a portion of the tread design is completely worn and the worn portion is of sufficient size to affect the traction and stopping ability of the tire. RSA 266:51 fixes how it is read: a gauge calibrated in thirty-seconds of an inch, in a major tread groove nearest the centre, at 2 points of the circumference not closer than 15 inches apart. The old numeric minimum sat in RSA 266:52, which was repealed by 1986, 218:2 effective January 1, 1987.

Sources

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.