Oregon Statewide Rule
Oregon Studded Tire Window: Nov. 1 to April 1, and ODOT Can Move It
Key Facts
- Statutory studded tire window
- Between November 1 of any year and April 1 of the following year (ORS 815.165(7)); ODOT publishes it as Nov. 1 through March 31
- Stud projection limits
- Not less than 0.04 inch and not more than 0.06 inch beyond the tread surface, wearing at the same rate as the tread
- Variable date authority
- ODOT may shorten or lengthen the period in any area of the state it specifically designates, for highway preservation or traveler safety
- Retractable studded tires
- Exempt year round under ORS 815.165(12); studs may project only when the operator extends them (ORS 815.045(1)(b)(E))
- Lightweight stud rule for dealers
- ORS 815.167 caps stud weight at 1.5 g (size 14 or less), 2.3 g (sizes 15 to 16) and 3.0 g (size 17 or larger)
- Penalty for studding out of season
- Class C traffic violation, $165 presumptive fine, $500 maximum for an individual
- Road damage liability
- Owner and driver jointly and severally liable to the state, county or city for all damage (ORS 818.410(10))
- Commercial chain law fine
- $880 presumptive fine for failure to use traction tires or chains in a vehicle registered under ORS chapter 826 (ORS 815.140(7))
Summary
Oregon does not licence studded tires, it bans metal studs outright and then suspends the ban for one winter window. ORS 815.160 makes it an offence to drive on any tire with a metal stud, cleat or bead projecting beyond the tread, and ORS 815.165(7) exempts studded tires only between November 1 of any year and April 1 of the following year, with the studs projecting not less than 0.04 inch and not more than 0.06 inch. ODOT publishes the season as November 1 through March 31 and holds statutory authority to shorten or lengthen it in any area of the state it designates, whenever preservation of the highway surface or the safety of the travelling public so indicates. Studding outside the window is a Class C traffic violation, and it separately exposes the owner and the driver to joint and several liability to the state, county or city for the pavement damage.
815.160 Unlawful use of metal objects on tires; civil liability; penalty. (1) A person commits the offense of unlawful use of metal objects on tires if the person does any of the following: (a) Drives or moves on a highway any vehicle equipped with any tire having on its periphery any block, stud, cleat, bead, chain or other protuberance of metal or other inflexible material that projects beyond the tread or traction surface of the tire. ... (7) Between November 1 of any year and April 1 of the following year, vehicles equipped with any tire having on its periphery studs of metal or other material projecting beyond the tread surface of the tire not less than four-hundredths (0.04) inch nor more than six-hundredths (0.06) inch and made of such material that the studs will wear, through use, at the same rate as the tread surface of the tire. When the preservation of the highway surface or the safety of the traveling public so indicates, the Department of Transportation shall have the authority to shorten or lengthen the period for the permissible use of such tires in any area of the state specifically designated by the department.
Full Breakdown
Read the two sections in order, because the drafting is unusual. ORS 815.160(1)(a) makes it the offence of unlawful use of metal objects on tires to drive or move on a highway any vehicle equipped with a tire carrying "any block, stud, cleat, bead, chain or other protuberance of metal or other inflexible material" that projects beyond the tread or traction surface. Subsection (1)(b) reaches the registered owner who causes or permits it, and provides that operation in violation is prima facie evidence that the owner permitted it. Only then does ORS 815.165 list twelve exemptions, and studded tires sit at exemption (7). So in Oregon the lawful winter tire is a carve-out from a prohibition, not a permitted accessory.
The window in the statute runs "between November 1 of any year and April 1 of the following year." ODOT states the season publicly as November 1 through March 31 and warns that driving on studs before November 1 or after March 31 carries a fine of nearly $200. The studs must project not less than four-hundredths (0.04) inch and not more than six-hundredths (0.06) inch beyond the tread surface, and must be made of material that wears at the same rate as the tread. The same sentence hands the Department of Transportation power to shorten or lengthen the permissible period "in any area of the state specifically designated by the department" when preservation of the highway surface or the safety of the traveling public so indicates. That is an area-specific power, not a statewide switch, so an extension granted for a mountain county does not travel to the Willamette Valley.
Retractable studded tires escape the calendar entirely. ORS 815.165(12) exempts vehicles equipped with retractable studded tires as defined in ORS 815.045, and ORS 815.045(1)(b)(E) defines them as tires with embedded studs that project beyond the tread surface only when the operator extends them to augment traction. ODOT adds that the studs must retract to at or below the wear bar of the tire and project not less than 0.04 inch when extended. There is also a supply-side rule most drivers never see: under ORS 815.167 a tire dealer may not sell a tire equipped with studs that are not lightweight studs, and may not sell a non-lightweight stud for installation in a tire. Lightweight is defined by weight, at 1.5 grams for stud size 14 or less, 2.3 grams for sizes 15 and 16, and 3.0 grams for size 17 or larger, and the stud must be one the tire manufacturer recommends for that type and size of tire. Retractable studs are exempted from that dealer restriction.
Oregon then bolts a separate chain-control regime onto the same chapter, and it is the part that actually stops traffic in the passes. ORS 815.140 creates the offence of failure to use vehicle traction tires or chains, and ORS 815.142 the offence of failure to carry them. Both bite only where a road authority has determined that conditions on a segment require them and has posted signs, under rules the Oregon Transportation Commission adopts through ORS 815.045. Subsection (5) of each section gives a defendant an affirmative defence: a court may not convict if it finds that highway conditions at the time of the citation did not require posting. ORS 815.145 exempts police vehicles under any conditions, fire vehicles responding to a fire, and ambulances responding to an emergency, and excuses a passenger vehicle or truck from chains if it weighs 6,500 pounds or less unloaded, is powered on both front and rear wheels, is carrying chains, wears traction tires on all wheels, is not towing, and is not being operated where it loses traction while stopping, cornering or moving.
ODOT operates that regime through signs and conditional closures. In typical conditions a vehicle rated 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight or less and not towing may substitute traction tires for chains, and ODOT defines traction tires to include studded tires, retractable studded tires, and tires marked with the three-peaked mountain and snowflake emblem for severe snow service. In bad conditions ODOT may impose a conditional closure requiring chains on all vehicles regardless of tire type, a step it says is frequent on Interstate 5 through the Siskiyou Pass south of Ashland, where a typical order reads that chains are required on all vehicles excluding four-wheel drive vehicles unless towing. Chain placement by axle and vehicle class, down to which tire of a dual-wheel axle must be chained, sits in Oregon Administrative Rules chapter 734, division 17. Motorcycles are exempt from carrying chains or traction tires and may not travel when chains or traction tires are required.
Violations & Penalties
188, and up to $1,000 for a corporation. ODOT describes the real-world cost as close to $200 once the surcharge is added. The exposure does not stop at the fine. 160 among the violations for which the owner and the driver are jointly and severally liable to the state, the county or the city for all damage done to the highway, street or bridge, with liability running to whichever government owns the road. 140 is also a Class C violation for ordinary drivers, but subsection (7) turns it into a specific fine violation with a presumptive fine of $880 where the vehicle was registered under ORS chapter 826, the chapter covering vehicles registered for interstate commercial operation. 142 is a Class C violation. 142(5) defence that conditions did not require posting.
Frequently Asked Questions
Exactly when can I run studded tires in Oregon?
Are studded tires legal in summer if I only drive in the mountains?
Can I be billed for road damage on top of the ticket?
Do studded tires satisfy an Oregon chain requirement?
What is the penalty for driving a posted snow zone without chains?
Do motorcycles have to carry chains in Oregon?
Sources
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.