Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Lawrence, MA Privacy & Surveillance: License Plate Readers (2026)

Significant Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified September 2026

Key Facts

Named technology
Automatic license plate readers, Sec. 9.25.020(E)(1)(b)
Approval needed
City council vote after public hearing
Pre-existing systems
180 days to get approved or must stop
Annual report due
March 31 each year
Court remedy
Injunction, mandamus, or evidence suppression

Summary

Lawrence's Surveillance Technology ordinance, Chapter 9.25, names automatic license plate readers as regulated surveillance technology and bars any city department from funding, acquiring, or using them without a public hearing and city council approval of a surveillance impact report and use policy.

Surveillance technology includes, but is not limited to: (a) international mobile subscriber (IMSI) catchers and other cell site simulators; (b) automatic license plate readers; (c) electronic toll readers ... A municipal entity must obtain approval from the city council, subsequent to a mandatory, properly-noticed, pertinent, public hearing at which the public is afforded a fair and adequate opportunity to provide testimony prior to engaging in any of the following: 1.Seeking funds for new or existing surveillance technology... 2.Acquiring or borrowing new surveillance technology... 3.Using new or existing surveillance technology for a purpose or in a manner not previously approved by the city council...

View official code

Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Code of Ordinances: Supplement 8).

Full Breakdown

Chapter 9.25 of the Lawrence Code, adopted by Doc. 133/2018 and effective September 21, 2018, defines surveillance technology at Section 9.25.020.E to include, among other listed devices, automatic license plate readers at subsection E.1(b). Section 9.25.030.A then requires that any municipal entity, meaning any city government agency, department, bureau, or unit, obtain approval from the city council, subsequent to a mandatory, properly-noticed, pertinent, public hearing at which the public is afforded a fair and adequate opportunity to provide testimony, before seeking funds for an ALPR system, acquiring or borrowing ALPR units, using ALPR data for a new purpose, or sharing ALPR data with another agency.

Before the council can approve an ALPR program, Section 9.25.040 requires the requesting department to submit a public surveillance impact report describing how the readers work, their proposed purpose, and any civil-liberties impact, plus a written surveillance use policy covering authorized uses, data retention limits, and rules for sharing plate-read data with outside agencies, including a required explanation of why the retention period is no longer than necessary. Section 9.25.050 forces the same public approval process onto any ALPR system already running before the chapter took effect, and gives the city 180 days from submission to approve it or the department must stop using it. Once approved, Section 9.25.090 requires an annual public report on how the ALPR data was used, shared, and geographically deployed, due every March 31, and Section 9.25.100 lets any person sue for injunctive or declaratory relief, or move to suppress evidence, over an ALPR program that skipped this approval process.

Violations & Fines

Funding, acquiring, or running an automatic license plate reader program without city council approval of a surveillance impact report and use policy violates Section 9.25.030. Section 9.25.100 lets any person seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief, a writ of mandamus, or evidence suppression in court over an unapproved ALPR deployment, and city employees who misuse ALPR data face disciplinary action.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Lawrence police add license plate readers without a public vote?
No. Section 9.25.030 requires city council approval, following a public hearing, before any municipal entity can fund, acquire, or use automatic license plate readers, which Section 9.25.020(E)(1)(b) names as regulated surveillance technology.
What happens to ALPR data Lawrence already collects?
The surveillance use policy required under Section 9.25.040 must set a limited retention period and explain why it is no longer than necessary, and Section 9.25.090 requires an annual public report on how the data was used and shared.
What if a Lawrence department was already using ALPRs before the ordinance?
Section 9.25.050 gives that department 180 days after submitting its impact report and use policy to win council approval; if the council has not approved it within that window, the department must stop using the technology.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Lawrence

All Lawrence rules

Compare Lawrence to another location·View the Massachusetts privacy & surveillance overview

Get notified when License Plate Readers in Lawrence, MA changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.