Richland, WA Public Conduct: Loitering Rules (2026)
Key Facts
- Status
- Repealed citywide by Ord. 20-11
- Former citation
- RMC § 9.06.080, Loitering
- Nearest substitute
- Disorderly conduct, RMC § 9.14.010
- Trespass alternative
- Second-degree trespass, RMC § 9.06.075
- Misdemeanor penalty
- Up to $1,000 fine or 90 days jail
Summary
The City of Richland, Washington abolished its own loitering statute. Richland Municipal Code § 9.06.080, once titled 'Loitering,' now reads only 'Repealed by Ord. 20-11.' No standalone crime of loitering exists on the books today; the Richland Police Department instead charges disorderly conduct, trespass, or failure to disperse when someone lingers unlawfully in public.
§ 9.06.080. Loitering. Repealed by Ord. 20-11.
Full Breakdown
Chapter 9.06 of the Richland Municipal Code, titled Crimes Against Property, used to include § 9.06.080, 'Loitering.' The section's operative text now consists of a single line: 'Repealed by Ord. 20-11,' sitting above the surviving history note '(Ord. 99-76 § 1.01; Ord. 4-85).' Ordinance 20-11 rewrote large portions of Title 9, Crime, in 2011, and the city council chose to strike the loitering offense rather than update it, alongside a companion repeal of § 9.12.100, 'Violation of Court Orders.' Because Richland carries no substitute anti-loitering provision anywhere else in Title 9, standing, sitting, or remaining in a public place is not, by itself, a city crime.
Officers responding to complaints about people gathering outside a business, park, or street corner instead reach for neighboring sections: § 9.14.010 defines disorderly persons, including anyone who fights, uses vulgar or profane language under circumstances creating a reasonable fear of assault, or intentionally obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic by linking arms, sitting, or standing in a right-of-way; § 9.06.075 covers second-degree trespass for remaining unlawfully on another's premises; and § 9.12.030 penalizes a group of three or more who refuse to disperse when ordered by a peace officer.
A person merely present on a public sidewalk with no aggravating conduct commits none of these offenses, so Development Services and the Richland Police Department treat loitering complaints as a call for one of these more specific statutes, or for private-property trespass enforcement requested by the property owner, rather than as a freestanding violation.
Violations & Fines
There is no loitering fine because there is no loitering charge. Related misdemeanors carry the RMC § 9.02.020(C) penalty: up to 90 days in jail, a $1,000 fine, or both. Disorderly conduct under § 9.14.020 and second-degree trespass under § 9.06.075 sit at that same misdemeanor level; failure to disperse under § 9.12.030 is also a misdemeanor when the underlying conduct risked injury or property harm.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is loitering illegal in the City of Richland, Washington?
What can police in Richland charge instead of loitering?
When did Richland repeal its loitering ordinance?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Richland
Compare Richland to another location·View the Washington public conduct overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.