Washington County, UT Right to Farm: Farm Nuisance Protection (2026)
Key Facts
- Core protection
- No damages for livestock trespass on unfenced land
- Governing section
- County Code § 9-4-3
- Fence standard referenced
- § 9-4-1, 48-inch legal fence
- Farming exception
- § 9-4-4 exempts primary farming areas
- Legal effect
- Civil defense, not a criminal penalty
Summary
Washington County shields ranchers from trespass damage claims: section 9-4-3 bars any court from awarding damages for livestock trespassing onto farms, subdivisions or other private property that was not enclosed by a legal fence, functioning as the county's fence-out protection for livestock operations.
Except as hereinafter provided, no person, firm or corporation shall be entitled to collect damages and no court in this state shall award damages for any trespass of livestock on farms, subdivisions and other private property in the county, if such land, at the time of such trespass, shall not have been enclosed by a legal fence.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: 2026 S-17: Code current through: Ord. 2026-1329-O, passed 8-18-2026).
Full Breakdown
Section 9-4-3, Collection Of Damages, states that except as otherwise provided, no person, firm or corporation is entitled to collect damages, and no court in the state may award damages, for a trespass of livestock onto farms, subdivisions or other private property in the county, if the land was not enclosed by a legal fence at the time of the trespass. That legal fence standard, set out in section 9-4-1, requires at least four horizontal barriers spaced no more than 12 inches apart, posts no more than 20 feet apart and at least 48 inches tall, capable of withstanding a 250-pound horizontal strain.
Section 9-4-2 places the burden of meeting that standard on the property owner seeking to exclude animals, not on the livestock owner, effectively protecting ranching and grazing operations from liability for animals that wander onto neighboring land the owner failed to fence. Section 9-4-4 narrows the chapter's reach further by exempting land used primarily for farming purposes from the fencing duty altogether, while still holding the duty over land bordering United States land used for grazing. Together these sections function as Washington County's version of a fence-out law: livestock owners are not liable for trespass onto unfenced ground, so the protection runs to the animal owner rather than through a nuisance exemption for farm operations themselves.
Violations & Fines
There is no criminal violation created by section 9-4-3 itself; instead it operates as a civil defense that forecloses a trespass damages lawsuit against a livestock owner when the plaintiff's land was not enclosed by a legal fence meeting the section 9-4-1 standard at the time of the trespass, regardless of how the animals got there.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a landowner sue if a neighbor's livestock wanders onto unfenced land?
Does this rule protect farmers, or does it protect neighboring landowners?
Are all farming areas exempt from the fencing requirement?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Washington County
Compare Washington County to another location·View the Utah right to farm overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.