Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

District of Columbia Statewide Rule

Washington DC: No Exemption for Private Card Games

Heavy RestrictionsApplies statewide across District of Columbia (2026)

Key Facts

Governing law
D.C. Code § 22-1704 (gaming table prohibition)
Broad definition
§ 22-1707 covers all games where money is wagered
Private-game exemption
None exists in Title 22, Chapter 17
Max penalty
5 years imprisonment, up to $12,500 fine
Only lawful exceptions
OLG-licensed lottery, bingo, sports betting, skill machines
Enforcing agency
Metropolitan Police Department / Office of Lottery and Gaming
Last verified: August 21, 2026

Summary

District of Columbia law sets no dollar threshold or family/friends carve-out for private betting games. D.C. Code § 22-1704 bans any "gaming table or gambling device" used to play for money, and § 22-1707 defines that term to sweep in "all games, devices, or contrivances at which money or any other thing shall be bet or wagered." A home poker night technically qualifies.

Whoever shall in the District set up or keep any gaming table, or any house, vessel, or place, on land or water, for the purpose of gaming, or gambling device commonly called A B C, faro bank, E O, roulette, equality, keno, thimbles, or little joker, or any kind of gaming table or gambling device adapted, devised, and designed for the purpose of playing any game of chance for money or property, or shall induce, entice, and permit any person to bet or play at or upon any such gaming table or gambling device... shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of not more than 5 years... [§ 22-1707:] "All games, devices, or contrivances at which money or any other thing shall be bet or wagered shall be deemed a gaming table within the meaning of §§ 22-1704 to 22-1706; and the courts shall construe said sections liberally, so as to prevent the mischief intended to be guarded against."

Full Breakdown

C. " The statute names specific banned games, faro bank, E O, roulette, keno, thimbles, little joker, but that list isn't the outer limit. " Unlike neighboring jurisdictions that carve out games played in a private home, among family, or for nominal stakes, the District's gambling chapter (Title 22, Chapter 17, Subchapter I) contains no such exemption. " An unlicensed card game at a kitchen table falls outside every category on that list. 01, a fine of up to $12,500 for offenses in that penalty bracket.

A separate, lesser track exists for unlicensed "game of skill machines" under § 22-1704(b), a misdemeanor capped at 180 days and a $1,000 fine, but that subsection targets coin-operated machines, not card or dice games among players.

Violations & Penalties

Enforcement targets whoever "sets up or keeps" the game rather than casual bettors alone, the statute criminalizes the host, dealer, or operator who "induces, entice[s], and permit[s]" others to play, not only the person who bets. MPD can charge a felony under § 22-1704(a): up to 5 years imprisonment and a fine up to $12,500 under the § 22-3571.01 schedule. Operating an unlicensed game-of-skill machine instead draws a misdemeanor, up to 180 days and a $1,000 fine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a private home poker game illegal in Washington, DC?
There's no statutory carve-out that says otherwise. D.C. Code § 22-1704(a) bans any "gaming table or gambling device" used "for the purpose of gaming," and § 22-1707 defines that phrase to include "all games, devices, or contrivances at which money or any other thing shall be bet or wagered": language broad enough to reach a private card game, with no dollar threshold or family exception written into the chapter.
What's the maximum penalty for running an illegal game in DC?
Section 22-1704(a) makes it a felony punishable by imprisonment for "not more than 5 years," plus a fine set by the District's uniform schedule at § 22-3571.01: up to $12,500 for offenses in that 1-to-5-year bracket. The statute reaches whoever "sets up or keeps" the game or "induces, entice[s], and permit[s]" others to play, so a host faces more exposure than a guest who simply bets.
Does DC allow any legal gambling at all?
Yes, but only through channels § 22-1717 names specifically: lotteries and daily-numbers games run by the Office of Lottery and Gaming, bingo, raffles, and Monte Carlo nights held for educational or charitable purposes, sports wagering, and game-of-skill machines, each one "regulated by the Office of Lottery and Gaming." An unlicensed card game at someone's apartment doesn't fall into any of those categories.
Has DC ever prosecuted a private social card game?
The Code itself doesn't distinguish enforcement priority by stakes or setting, and there's no published District data isolating home-game prosecutions from other § 22-1704 gambling-table cases. What's grounded in the statute is the absence of an exemption, § 22-1707's sweeping definition and § 22-1704's liberal-construction directive leave no textual basis for treating a private game differently from a commercial one.

Sources

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.