Montana Statewide Rule
Montana Partition Fence and Boundary Fence Law
Key Facts
- Partition fence statute
- MCA 70-16-205
- Open range rule
- MCA 81-4-201
- Adverse possession
- MCA 70-19-411
- Cost sharing
- Just proportion required
Summary
Montana statute MCA 70-16-205 establishes the partition fence rule: when a neighbor encloses land bordering an existing fence, they must pay a just proportion of the fence value. Property line fence disputes also fall under Montana spite fence and adverse possession doctrines.
70-16-205 . Monuments and fences -- mutual obligation of adjoining owners. (1) Coterminous owners are mutually bound equally to maintain: (a) the boundaries and monuments between them; (b) the fences between them, unless one of them chooses to let that owner's land lie without fencing, in which case if that owner afterwards encloses it, that owner shall refund to the other owner a just proportion of the value, at that time, of any division fence made by the other owner. However, using land for grazing or pasturage of any kind must be considered a usage of the land, and the land may not be considered as lying idle under the provisions of this section. (2) Except as provided by prescription, custom, or agreement between coterminous owners, each coterminous owner shall maintain all fencing to the right of the midpoint of the common boundary line as viewed from the owner's land. If the land of one owner is entirely surrounded by the land of another, each owner shall maintain all fencing to the right, as viewed from the owner's land, of the northeastern corner of the surrounded land or, if there is more than one northeastern corner, then from the northernmost northeastern corner to a point midway around the surrounded land. If there is a substantial difference in terrain or topographical features of the land between the coterminous owners, responsibility for maintaining the fence must be determined by mutual agreement with consideration given to factors such as cost and time.
Full Breakdown
Under MCA 70-16-205, when a person encloses land joining a fence already built by their neighbor, they must refund a just proportion of the fence's value. Montana also follows the open range doctrine in much of the state under MCA 81-4-201, where landowners must fence livestock out rather than in. The state Supreme Court recognizes spite fence claims under nuisance principles when fences serve no legitimate purpose. Boundary fence placement can also trigger adverse possession analysis under MCA 70-19-411 if maintained openly for the statutory period. Counties may adopt herd districts that reverse the fencing-out rule.
Violations & Penalties
Civil action for contribution under MCA 70-16-205. Nuisance and adverse possession remedies available through district court.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does my Montana neighbor have to share fence costs?
Is Montana an open range state?
Sources
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.