Roseville, CA Historic Preservation: Historic-Cultural Monuments (2026)
Key Facts
- Buildings listed
- 12 named significant buildings citywide
- Demolition permit
- Design Review Permit under Ch. 19.76
- Required findings
- 4 findings, incl. public benefit
- Age threshold
- 50+ years old qualifies
- Danger exemption
- Chief building inspector written determination
- Max penalty
- $500 fine or 6 months jail
Summary
Roseville protects buildings with special historic, cultural, or aesthetic value under Municipal Code Chapter 19.61. A structure that is at least 50 years old, listed on the National or California Register of Historic Places, or tied to a notable person or event can be designated a "significant building," and its demolition requires a discretionary Design Review Permit.
Permits Required. No person shall demolish or cause to be demolished any significant building without first obtaining approval of a Design Review Permit or Design Review Permit modification in the manner set forth in Chapter 19.76 of this title, unless the building is exempt from such permit, as described in subsection D.
Full Breakdown
Chapter 19.61 lists twelve significant buildings by name and assessor's parcel number, including the West House, Barker Hotel, Bank of Italy Building, McRae Building, Odd Fellow Hall, Kaseberg House, Citizens Bank, Vernon Street Hotel, Masonic Building (Roseville Theater), Tower Theater, Placer County Exhibit Building, First Methodist Church, and Hemphill House. Section 19.61.020 defines a "significant building" as one that is at least 50 years old, listed on the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historic Places, or determined by the City Council to be notably associated with historic persons, events, or Roseville's broader history. Any person may petition the Planning Manager to add or remove a building from the list, and the City Council can also initiate the amendment on its own motion, following the zoning-amendment process in Chapter 19.86.
Before a listed building can come down, Section 19.61.040 requires the owner to obtain a Design Review Permit under Chapter 19.76 and secure four specific findings: that the development could not occur without demolition, that it provides a substantial public benefit outweighing the loss, that feasible mitigation has been incorporated, and that restoration is not economically or technically feasible. Mitigation options the Planning Manager can require include preserving the structure in place, relocating it on-site or elsewhere, salvaging architectural materials, and commissioning an archival photographic study before the building is razed. The permit requirement does not apply when the chief building inspector determines, in writing under Chapter 16.35, that a listed building is dangerous to occupants or the public; once such a building is demolished, the Planning Manager processes an amendment removing it from the list.
Violations & Fines
Chapter 19.61 has no separate penalty clause, so demolishing a listed significant building without an approved Design Review Permit is enforced as a Title 19 zoning violation under Section 19.90.030: a misdemeanor punishable by up to $500.00 and six months in county jail, or, at the City Attorney's discretion, a reduced infraction of up to $250.00, with each day of violation charged as a separate offense.
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies a Roseville building as "significant"?
Can I demolish one of Roseville's 12 listed significant buildings?
Does a dangerous building still need a Design Review Permit before demolition?
How does a building get added to or removed from the list?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Roseville
California rules heatmap·Compare Roseville to another location·View the California historic preservation overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.