California Davis-Stirling requires HOAs to offer Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR, Civ Code §5900-5920) free of charge and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR, Civ Code §5925-5965) before most lawsuits over governing documents. ADR must be offered in writing; refusal by either party is admissible in subsequent litigation. Prevailing party attorney's fees available under Civ Code §5975 for covenant enforcement.
Davis-Stirling establishes a mandatory layered dispute resolution system for Elk Grove HOA disputes. Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR, Civ Code §5900-5920): Members may request a meet-and-confer with the board to resolve disputes. Associations must have written IDR procedures adopted per §5915; if none, a default procedure applies where the member requests a meeting and the board must meet within a reasonable time. Outcome is documented in writing. ADR (Civ Code §5925-5965) is required before filing most lawsuits enforcing governing documents (CC&Rs, bylaws, rules) or Davis-Stirling itself, unless claim is under $10,000 and small claims court is used, or injunctive relief is sought. The party demanding ADR sends a Request for Resolution letter; the other party has 30 days to accept; if accepted, ADR must conclude within 90 days. Costs typically split. Mediators/arbitrators often through agencies like JAMS or AAA. Failure to participate is admissible at trial and affects attorney's fees. Civil Code §5975 awards attorney's fees to the prevailing party in covenant enforcement actions—this is a powerful tool in both directions. For assessment collection, IDR must be offered before pre-lien per Civ Code §5665.
Failing to offer IDR/ADR when required: can result in case dismissal without prejudice, adverse fee rulings. Association failure to follow own IDR policy: procedural challenge to enforcement.
See how Elk Grove's dispute resolution rules stack up against other locations.
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.