Worcester, MA Privacy & Surveillance: Facial Recognition Ban (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing section
- Chapter Two, § 41
- Ordained
- December 14, 2021, Ordinance #923
- Covers
- City officers, employees, contractors, vendors
- Banned conduct
- Obtain, retain, request, access, use facial surveillance
- Exceptions
- Phone unlock, redaction software, child-search act
Summary
Worcester bans city government and police from acquiring, retaining, requesting, accessing or using facial surveillance technology or any data derived from it. Chapter Two, Section 41, ordained December 14, 2021, covers every city department, officer, employee, agent, contractor and vendor.
It shall be unlawful for Worcester or any Worcester official to knowingly obtain, retain, request, access, or use: (1) Any facial surveillance system; or (2) Any information obtained from a facial surveillance system. (d) Enforcement. (1) No data collected or derived from any use of facial surveillance in violation of this Order and no evidence derived therefrom may be used in any proceeding in or before any department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority subject to the jurisdiction of the City of Worcester.
Full Breakdown
Chapter Two, Section 41 of the Revised Ordinances of 2008, ordained December 14, 2021 as ordinance #923, makes it unlawful for the City of Worcester or any "Worcester official" (defined to include any officer, employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor, or vendor acting on the city's behalf) to knowingly obtain, retain, request, access, or use any facial surveillance system, or any information obtained from one. "Facial surveillance" is defined as an automated or semi-automated process that assists in identifying or verifying an individual based on the physical characteristics of that person's face.
The ordinance also imposes an evidentiary rule: no data collected or derived from facial surveillance used in violation of the ordinance, and no evidence derived from it, may be used in any proceeding before any city department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee or other authority under the City's jurisdiction. , unlocking a phone); using social media or communications software to reach the public as long as that use does not affirmatively deploy facial surveillance; using automated redaction software that lacks facial surveillance capability; and complying with the National Child Search Assistance Act. The ordinance states it does not limit any individual's rights under state or federal law.
Violations & Fines
The ordinance itself sets no fine schedule. Section 41(d)(2) directs that violations "will be addressed in accordance with the City's usual practices, applicable law and contractual obligations," and any evidence obtained through a violation is barred from use in city proceedings under subsection (d)(1).
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Worcester's ban stop city police from using facial recognition?
Can facial-recognition evidence from another agency be used in a Worcester case?
Does unlocking a city-issued phone with Face ID violate the ban?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Worcester
Compare Worcester to another location·View the Massachusetts privacy & surveillance overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.