Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Roseville, CA Public Conduct: Loud Party Ordinance (2026)

Some Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified August 2026

Key Facts

First response
Written warning only, no charge
Second response window
Within 12 hours of warning
Cost billed
Personnel, equipment, mutual aid
Minor hosts
Parents/guardians pay costs
Governing chapter
RMC Chapter 9.25, adopted 2007

Summary

Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 9.25 makes party hosts personally liable for the cost of police response. Officers who answer a loud, boisterous, or disorderly gathering issue a written disturbance warning on the first call. If police must return to the same address within 12 hours for a similar disturbance, the responsible party is billed for the city's full extraordinary law enforcement costs.

When police department personnel respond to any premises or location as a result of a disturbance, including, but not limited to, loud and boisterous conduct, noises and activities, disturbing the peace, a congregation of two or more persons in intoxicated conditions or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, fighting, using obscene or inflammatory language, loud music constituting a nuisance or disturbing the peace, vehicular racing and cruising, use or display of narcotics, illegal drugs and controlled substances and paraphernalia for its use, or congregating in a noisy or rowdy crowd, indecent exposure and lewd conduct, resulting in a threat to the public peace, health, safety or general welfare, the responding officers may issue a written disturbance violation warning to the responsible party. The warning shall state that if police department personnel are required to return to the same premises or location within the following 12 hour period because of further similar disturbances, each additional response shall constitute an extraordinary law enforcement response.

Full Breakdown

010 authorizes police to respond to loud and boisterous conduct, disturbing the peace, intoxicated congregations, fighting, loud music constituting a nuisance, vehicular racing and cruising, narcotics activity, or a noisy or rowdy crowd. On the first response, officers may issue a written disturbance violation warning to the responsible party, who must sign to acknowledge receipt; if the person refuses to sign or is unavailable, the warning is posted in a conspicuous location instead, and refusing to sign does not relieve the responsible party of later liability.

The warning states that any further similar disturbance requiring police to return to the same premises within the next 12 hours becomes an extraordinary law enforcement response. 015 defines extraordinary services as those necessarily and reasonably incurred by the city, over and above normal police services, because citizens failed to comply with the warning. 020, the police chief or a designee may deem the second and any subsequent response extraordinary, and the responsible party is charged for all personnel, equipment and mutual aid costs of those responses, plus any damage to city property and injuries to city personnel.

030 defines the responsible party as the person or persons in charge of the premises or location, or in charge of the event or gathering; if that person is a minor, the parents or guardians become the responsible party instead. 040 makes the cost-recovery scheme a nonexclusive remedy: the city can still bring separate civil or criminal action to abate the underlying disturbance. The chapter traces to Ordinance 4536, adopted in 2007.

Violations & Fines

A first loud-party call draws only a written warning; no fee attaches. A second or later police response to the same address within 12 hours triggers full cost recovery for personnel, equipment and mutual aid under Section 9.25.020, plus city property damage and personnel injury costs. Hosts cannot avoid liability by refusing to sign the warning or notice. Because Section 9.25.040 makes the billing scheme nonexclusive, the city attorney can still pursue a separate misdemeanor, infraction, or civil nuisance action for the same disturbance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Roseville fine me the first time police come to my loud party?
No. Under RMC Section 9.25.010, the first response draws only a written disturbance violation warning that the responsible party must sign. There is no cost charge yet, but the warning puts the host on notice that a repeat call within 12 hours will be billed as an extraordinary law enforcement response.
What does the city charge for a second police response?
Section 9.25.020 makes the responsible party pay for all personnel, equipment and mutual aid costs the police department incurs on the second and any later response within the 12-hour window, plus any damage to city property or injuries to city personnel during that response.
Who is billed if the party is thrown by a minor?
Section 9.25.030 defines the responsible party as whoever is in charge of the premises or the gathering. If that person is a minor, the chapter shifts responsibility to the minor's parents or legal guardians, who become liable for the extraordinary law enforcement costs.
Can I still be criminally cited even after paying the extraordinary response bill?
Yes. Section 9.25.040 makes the cost-recovery program a nonexclusive remedy, so the city attorney can still file a separate misdemeanor, infraction, or civil nuisance action against the responsible party for the underlying disturbance in addition to billing for the police response.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Roseville

All Roseville rules

California rules heatmap·Compare Roseville to another location·View the California public conduct overview

Get notified when Loud Party Ordinance in Roseville, CA changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.