San Jacinto, CA Public Conduct: Loud Party Ordinance (2026)
Key Facts
- Cost cap
- $1,000 per single incident (§ 2.48.040)
- Trigger
- Second or later police response after a written warning
- Who pays
- Owner, person in charge, or organizer of the event
- Minor hosts
- Parents or guardians are jointly and severally liable
- Evidence
- Chief of police can impound stereo and amplifying equipment
- Appeal
- To the San Jacinto City Council (§ 2.48.060)
Summary
In the City of San Jacinto, California, the first police response to a disturbing party on private property produces a written warning. Every later response to the same premises is billed to the person responsible, up to $1,000 per incident, under Chapter 2.48 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
A. First Police Response. A written warning shall be issued to the person responsible. The warning shall inform the person responsible that if police personnel are required to return to the same premises or location because of similar or continuing disturbances, such further responses shall constitute special security services. Further, this warning shall state the responsible party will be charged for the cost of providing such special security services. The warning shall be signed by the person responsible or if there is a refusal to sign, the warning shall have the words entered "refused to sign" acknowledging receipt of the warning. A copy of the warning shall be left with the responsible party. B. Police personnel utilized during a second or subsequent response after a first written warning will be deemed to be on a special security assignment over and above the services normally provided. The person responsible will be charged for the actual police costs expended by the city on the second or subsequent responses.
Full Breakdown
Chapter 2.48 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code, adopted by the City Council as Ord. 951 in 1992, exists to reimburse the police department for second and subsequent responses to gatherings that cause disturbances on private property, including unlicensed paid admission dances or concerts. The process starts with a written warning under § 2.48.030(A). Officers issue it to the person responsible, and it must state that any return trip for similar or continuing disturbances counts as special security services billed to that person. The warning is signed by the person responsible, or the officer enters the words "refused to sign," and a copy is left with the responsible party.
The "person responsible" is defined in § 2.48.020 as the owner of the property, the person in charge of the premises, and/or the organizer of the event. When that person is a minor, the parents or guardians are jointly and severally liable for the police costs. A "party," "gathering" or "event" is any group assembled for a social occasion or social activity on private property.
Under § 2.48.040, the charge covers personnel, equipment and administrative costs, capped at one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) for a single incident. Personnel and administrative time is figured at a per minute cost at current rates, and equipment is figured at repair or replacement value. The fee is supplementary to all other fines and penalties, and the City keeps the right to pursue actual costs above the cap through other legal remedies. Unpaid charges are a debt to the City, collectible in a court action that includes reasonable attorney fees.
Section 2.48.050 lets the chief of police or a designee impound evidence of unlawful activity from the premises, including stereo equipment, musical instruments, radios, amplifying equipment and recording equipment. Anyone aggrieved by the chief of police's decision to assess a penalty under the chapter can appeal to the City Council under § 2.48.060.
Violations & Fines
A second or later police response to the same premises after a written warning is billed as a special security assignment. The person responsible pays the actual police costs, up to $1,000 for a single incident, on top of any fine for the underlying violation. Unpaid amounts become a debt to the City of San Jacinto, recoverable in court with reasonable attorney fees. Impounded amplifying equipment and similar evidence can be held by the chief of police.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I get a warning before I am charged for a loud party in San Jacinto?
What is the most the City of San Jacinto can bill for one party?
Who is liable if a minor throws the party?
Can I challenge the charge?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in San Jacinto
California rules heatmap·Compare San Jacinto to another location·View the California public conduct overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Loud Party Ordinance in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Riverside County handle loud party ordinance.