Washington County, MN Right to Farm: Agricultural Zoning Protection (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing section
- Development Code Ch. 2 § 1.1(2), General Standards
- Protection
- Compliant farm and livestock use is not a violation
- Trigger
- Change in surrounding area's character does not void it
- Coverage
- Unincorporated townships only, not incorporated cities
- Condition
- Operation must comply with the Development Code itself
- Effective date
- 06/05/2018 per Chapter Two
Summary
Washington County's Development Code shields compliant farms from being cited as zoning violations when new houses move in nearby. Chapter Two, Section 1.1(2) says agricultural and livestock operations that follow the code cannot be deemed a violation just because the surrounding area's character has changed, protecting farmers in the county's unincorporated townships from neighbor-driven zoning complaints.
(2) All agricultural and livestock operations being conducted in compliance with the terms of this Development Code shall not be deemed a violation of this Development Code notwithstanding the fact that there may have been changes in the surrounding character of the area.
Full Breakdown
1, General Standards, item (2) of the Washington County Development Code, effective 06/05/2018. It states that all agricultural and livestock operations being conducted in compliance with the terms of the Development Code shall not be deemed a violation of the Development Code notwithstanding the fact that there may have been changes in the surrounding character of the area. In practice, that means a farmer who was operating lawfully before nearby rural land was subdivided or built out with rural residential lots cannot be forced into non-conforming-use enforcement or cited for a zoning violation solely because new neighbors changed the character of the surrounding land.
1 of Chapter Two apply within the unincorporated portions of the county to the functions and overlay districts identified in Chapter One, covering subdivision of land, subsurface sewage treatment systems, the St. Croix River Management Overlay, Shoreland Management Overlay, mining operations, floodplains and official map areas. Because the county's regulatory reach under this section extends only to the unincorporated area, the protection covers farm operations in the townships but not agricultural land inside incorporated cities such as Woodbury, Stillwater, Oakdale, Cottage Grove or Forest Lake, each of which zones and enforces under its own municipal code.
The provision does not create a blanket immunity: it protects only operations that are being conducted in compliance with the terms of the Development Code, so a farm that itself violates setback, feedlot or other performance standards in the Code gets no shelter from this clause.
Violations & Fines
The protection itself imposes no penalty; it removes one. An agricultural operation that falls outside it, because it does not comply with the Development Code's own standards, is treated like any other violation: Chapter One, Section 15.1 makes violating any Development Code provision a misdemeanor, with the violator subject to a fine, imprisonment, or both plus the cost of prosecution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can new neighbors force an established Washington County farm to shut down?
Does this farm protection apply inside Woodbury or Stillwater?
Does the protection cover a farm that is already violating the code?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Washington County
Compare Washington County to another location·View the Minnesota right to farm overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.