Cupertino, CA Tobacco & Vaping: Flavored Tobacco Bans (2026)
Key Facts
- Ban scope
- All characterizing flavors other than tobacco
- Named flavors
- Menthol, mint, fruit, coconut, chocolate
- Covers
- Smoke and vapor, not just the product
- Presumption trigger
- Any marketing claim of a flavor
- Enforcer
- Santa Clara County Dept. of Environmental Health
Summary
Cupertino Municipal Code Section 5.50.030 makes it unlawful for any Tobacco Retailer to sell a tobacco product with a characterizing flavor or aroma other than tobacco itself, naming menthol, mint, fruit, and dessert flavors, and creates a rebuttable presumption of a violation whenever a manufacturer's marketing or packaging claims a flavor.
Flavored Tobacco Products. No Retailer shall sell a Tobacco Product containing, as a constituent or additive, an artificial or natural flavor or aroma (other than tobacco ) or an herb or spice, including but not limited to strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa, chocolate, cherry, mint, menthol, or coffee, that is a characterizing flavor or aroma of the Tobacco Product, smoke or vapor produced by the Tobacco Product.
Full Breakdown
50 prohibits any Retailer from selling a Tobacco Product containing, as a constituent or additive, an artificial or natural flavor or aroma other than tobacco, or an herb or spice, listing strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa, chocolate, cherry, mint, menthol, and coffee as examples of a prohibited characterizing flavor. The ban covers the smoke or vapor produced by the product as well as the product itself, so flavored e-liquids fall under both this flavor ban and the chapter's separate, total prohibition on Electronic Cigarette Products in the same section.
Enforcement does not require a lab test: a product is presumed to violate the flavor ban if its manufacturer or anyone associated with its sale publicly claims the product has a characterizing flavor, or if its label, packaging, or any accompanying text or image communicates that claim, shifting the burden to the retailer to rebut the presumption. 020, makes clear that Tobacco Product reaches everything regulated under Subchapter IX of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, including cigarettes, cigars, roll-your-own, smokeless tobacco, and waterpipe tobacco, so the flavor ban is not limited to vaping products. 50.
Violations & Fines
A retailer caught selling flavored tobacco faces impoundment or seizure of the product under Section 5.50.160, permit revocation under Section 5.50.060 for a chapter violation within the prior sixty months, and civil enforcement by the Santa Clara County Office of County Counsel, with each day of sale and each unit sold treated as a separate violation. Retailers may contest a written notice of penalties before a county hearing officer under Section 5.50.150 by filing within the stated deadline and paying the $250 filing fee.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Cupertino ban menthol cigarettes?
How does the city prove a product is flavored?
Is the flavor ban only about vaping liquids?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Cupertino
California rules heatmap·Compare Cupertino to another location·View the California tobacco & vaping overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Flavored Tobacco Bans in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Santa Clara County handle flavored tobacco bans.