Moreno Valley, CA Animal Ordinances: Breed Restrictions (2026)
Key Facts
- State preemption
- Food & Ag. Code § 31683 bars breed bans
- Local program
- MVMC Ch. 10.02, based on conduct
- Hearing window
- 10 calendar days to request hearing
- Court option
- Hearing set 5-10 working days (§10.02.210)
- Required sign
- 2-inch letters, 'Beware of vicious dog'
Summary
California Food and Agricultural Code Section 31683 bars any city dog-control program from being "specific as to breed," so Moreno Valley does not ban or restrict animals by breed. Instead, Chapter 10.02 of its Municipal Code declares individual dogs "potentially dangerous" or "vicious" based on documented bites or attacks under Sections 10.02.200, 10.02.210 and 10.02.230.
31683. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a city or county from adopting or enforcing its own program for the control of potentially dangerous or vicious dogs that may incorporate all, part, or none of this chapter, or that may punish a violation of this chapter as a misdemeanor or may impose a more restrictive program to control potentially dangerous or vicious dogs. Except as provided in Section 122331 of the Health and Safety Code, no program regulating any dog shall be specific as to breed.
Full Breakdown
010, by the animal's conduct rather than its breed. 200, the animal services administrator or chief animal control officer may issue an administrative restraint order requiring secure enclosure; the owner has 10 calendar days to request a hearing before a city-selected hearing officer, held within 10 business days. 210 lets animal services instead petition the superior court, with a hearing set five to 10 working days after notice. 230 lets the department deny or revoke licensing for a dog found "unlicensable" for repeat violations or a documented history of irresponsible ownership, again with a 10-day window to request a hearing. 240 requires a posted "Beware of vicious dog" sign with letters at least two inches tall at the property's entrance.
Violations & Fines
Maintaining an unlicensed potentially dangerous or vicious dog in the city is unlawful under Section 10.02.230(F). Ignoring a restraint order or failing to post the required warning sign under Section 10.02.240 exposes the owner to impoundment and abatement action under Section 10.02.250, which can include destruction of the animal as a public nuisance independent of any criminal prosecution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Moreno Valley ban a dog breed as dangerous?
How does a dog get declared "potentially dangerous" or "vicious" in Moreno Valley?
What happens if an owner ignores a restraint order?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Moreno Valley
How Moreno Valley compares: Cities with No Dog Breed Restrictions·California rules heatmap·Compare Moreno Valley to another location·View the California animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Breed Restrictions in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Riverside County handle breed restrictions.