Redlands, CA Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Citywide microchip mandate
- None
- Triggered by
- Ch. 6.05 dangerous-dog declaration
- Governing section
- Redlands City Code § 6.05.120(B)(1)(a)
- Cost
- Owner's expense
- Companion duties
- License + rabies vaccine
Summary
Redlands has no citywide microchip mandate. The only microchipping duty in the code applies to a dog already declared potentially dangerous or vicious under Chapter 6.05, which must be microchipped at the owner's expense before the dog is released.
The dog shall be licensed and vaccinated in accordance with Chapter 6.04 of this Code, and microchipped, at owner's expense.
Full Breakdown
Redlands City Code § 6.05.120(B)(1)(a) states that a dog found to be potentially dangerous or vicious "shall be licensed and vaccinated in accordance with Chapter 6.04 of this Code, and microchipped, at owner's expense." This microchip duty sits inside the release conditions the Animal Services Supervisor must impose once a dog is designated dangerous or vicious under Chapter 6.05 (Ord. 2988, 2026), alongside spay/neuter, a $100,000 liability bond, warning signage and the six-foot leash cap. Outside that context, Title 6 imposes no general microchip requirement on dog owners: ordinary licensing under Chapter 6.04 requires only a metal tag fastened to the collar (§ 6.04.050) and proof of rabies vaccination (§§ 6.04.140-.150), with no microchip prerequisite.
Because the microchip duty is triggered only after a formal potentially-dangerous or vicious-dog determination under §§ 6.05.010, 6.05.020 and a written Notice and Order under § 6.05.120, an owner of a dog with no bite or attack history is not required to microchip it under city law. Failure to comply with an imposed condition, including the microchip requirement, is enforced as a misdemeanor and a declared public nuisance under §§ 6.05.080 and 6.05.180(B), and the Animal Services Supervisor can require proof of compliance before releasing a declared dog.
Violations & Fines
Failing to microchip a dog after it has been declared potentially dangerous or vicious, along with any other unmet § 6.05.120 condition, is a misdemeanor and a public nuisance under §§ 6.05.080 and 6.05.180(B), and can support continued impoundment under § 6.05.110 until conditions are met.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Redlands require all dogs to be microchipped?
When does Redlands require microchipping a dog?
Who pays for the microchip?
What happens if I do not microchip a declared dangerous dog?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Redlands
California rules heatmap·Compare Redlands to another location·View the California animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Microchipping in Nearby Cities
How other cities in San Bernardino County handle microchipping.