James City County, VA Landscaping Rules: Artificial Turf (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing section
- James City County Code Sec. 23-3
- Turf classification
- Accessory use, impermeable landing
- Countywide reach
- Whole county is a CBPA under Sec. 23-4
- Impervious cover cap
- 60 percent of site, Sec. 23-9(b)(1)b
- Exception deadline
- Manager acts within 35 calendar days
Summary
James City County allows synthetic turf in a yard, but the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance treats it as an accessory use, the same category as pools and patios, precisely because it is an impermeable landing that blocks groundwater infiltration. Installing or expanding turf beyond what's already approved requires a formal exception review rather than a routine landscaping sign-off.
Accessory uses include, but are not limited to, in-ground pools, patios, terraces, tennis courts, synthetic turf, and other impermeable landings that do not permit infiltration to groundwater. Any modification or expansion to an accessory use must be reviewed and approved using a formal exception process. ... Keeping impervious cover to a minimum enhances rainwater infiltration and effectively reduces increases of stormwater runoff.
Full Breakdown
Sec. 23-3 of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance defines 'accessory uses' to include synthetic turf by name, alongside in-ground pools, patios, terraces and tennis courts, grouping them together as impermeable landings that do not permit infiltration to groundwater. That classification matters because Sec. 23-4 designates the entirety of James City County as a Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area, so the rule reaches a backyard turf installation anywhere in the county, not just waterfront lots. Installing turf where none previously existed, or modifying or expanding an existing installation, falls under the accessory-use rule in Sec.
23-3 that requires review and approval through a formal exception process rather than a simple landscaping permit. The performance standards in Sec. 23-9 explain why: the purpose section states that keeping impervious cover to a minimum enhances rainwater infiltration and effectively reduces increases of stormwater runoff, and the general standards cap total impervious cover, which synthetic turf counts toward, at 60 percent of the site under Sec. 23-9(b)(1)b. A homeowner who wants to install more turf than the impervious-cover math allows has to either redesign the layout or seek an exception.
Exception requests for an accessory-use change like turf go to the manager, who must act within 35 calendar days of a complete application under Sec. 23-16, and any granted exception expires after 12 months if substantial work hasn't started. Because the standard applies through the CBPA rather than the zoning ordinance's landscaping article, a turf project also has to be checked against the impervious-cover math on the specific lot, not just against a generic yard-coverage rule.
Violations & Fines
Installing or expanding synthetic turf without going through the Sec. 23-3 exception process, or without keeping total site impervious cover at or under 60 percent, is a violation of Chapter 23 subject to the civil penalties in Sec. 23-18, up to $5,000 per day of violation or a one-time civil charge of up to $10,000, plus a stop-work order from the manager if work is discovered underway.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is artificial turf banned in James City County?
Does the turf rule apply only to waterfront properties?
How long does a turf exception review take?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in James City County
How James City County compares: Most Artificial Turf-Friendly Cities·Compare James City County to another location·View the Virginia landscaping rules overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.