Richland, WA Landscaping Rules: Tree Trimming (2026)
Key Facts
- Duty
- Prune ROW trees for sidewalk/street vertical clearance
- Governing section
- RMC § 22.14.080(A)(2)(a)(iii)
- Pruning standard
- Must follow ANSI A300 practices
- Topping barred
- No topping/shearing without arborist approval
- Uncorrected obstruction
- City abates and bills owner, RMC § 22.14.140
- Penalty
- Civil penalty, RMC § 10.02.050(E)
Summary
Richland requires the owner of property next to a public right-of-way tree to keep its branches pruned for sufficient vertical clearance over the adjoining sidewalk and street, under RMC § 22.14.080(A)(2)(a)(iii); topping, heading or shearing those trees is barred without the municipal arborist's approval.
2. Routine Tree Maintenance. a. Pruning of trees located on public rights-of-way adjacent to the owner's private real property. i. Prune and maintain such trees according to ANSI A300; ii. Topping, heading, shearing or rounding over are not acceptable forms of tree pruning and are not allowed on public trees unless first approved by the municipal arborist; iii. Except as otherwise determined by the municipal arborist, branches that overhang sidewalks or streets shall be pruned to provide sufficient vertical clearance over the sidewalk and street so as not to interfere with public travel;
Full Breakdown
Adjacent property owners must prune trees on the public right-of-way next to their land according to ANSI A300 standards, control pests on them, and water them enough to keep them healthy, per RMC § 22.14.080(A)(2). The clearance duty specifically requires branches overhanging a sidewalk or street to be cut back for enough vertical clearance that they do not interfere with public travel, unless the municipal arborist sets a different standard. The same clearance rule applies to private trees whose overhanging branches are declared a public nuisance under RMC § 22.14.130(B).
Cutting larger limbs, over one inch in diameter on smaller Class I trees or over two inches on Class II and larger trees, counts as 'maintenance' requiring a no-fee permit from the municipal arborist under RMC § 22.14.090; lighter routine care does not. If an owner does not correct an obstructing tree after notice, the municipal arborist can abate the nuisance directly and bill the reasonable cost to the property owner under RMC § 22.14.140, with unpaid amounts becoming a lien on the property. Topping, heading, shearing or rounding a public tree is barred unless the municipal arborist approves it first, and any pruning must otherwise follow ANSI A300 practices. Violations of the maintenance duty are enforced the same way as the rest of the tree ordinance, through RMC § 22.14.120.
Violations & Fines
Failing to keep required sidewalk and street clearance is a civil violation under RMC § 22.14.120, penalized under RMC § 10.02.050(E); a third violation of the same or similar provision at the same location becomes a misdemeanor under RMC § 1.30.010. An obstructing tree can also be declared a public nuisance under RMC § 22.14.130(B), and if the owner does not abate it after notice, the municipal arborist may do the work and charge the cost to the property, per RMC § 22.14.140.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who has to trim branches hanging over a Richland sidewalk?
What if the tree isn't trimmed for clearance?
Can I top a right-of-way tree myself to get clearance?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Richland
Compare Richland to another location·View the Washington landscaping rules overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Tree Trimming in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Benton County handle tree trimming.