Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Boulder, CO Noise Ordinances: Barking Dogs (2026)

Some Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified September 2026

Barking dog rules in Boulder, CO, also called nuisance dog, dog noise, or excessive barking ordinances, define when a barking dog becomes a code violation and how complaints are handled.

Key Facts

Governing section
BRC § 6-1-19
Prior warning required
Yes, within 12 months
Trial proof standard
Two witnesses or corroboration
Cat exception
Applies if cat off premises
Maximum penalty
$2,650 fine or 90 days jail

Summary

Boulder Revised Code § 6-1-19 bars any animal guardian from letting a pet disturb the peace with loud, persistent or habitual barking, howling, yelping or similar noise, on or off the owner's property. Before anyone can be charged, the city must have already given a written warning about that specific animal within the prior twelve months.

(a)No person owning or keeping any animal shall fail to prevent such animal from disturbing the peace of any other person by loud and persistent or loud and habitual barking, howling, yelping, braying, whinnying, crowing, calling, or making any other loud and persistent or loud and habitual noise, whether the animal is on or off the guardian's or keeper's premises.(b)No person shall be charged with violating this section unless a written warning was given to the person by an agent or employee of the city within twelve months preceding the first date alleged as a date of violation in the complaint.(c)No person shall be convicted at trial of violating this section unless two or more witnesses testify to the loud and persistent or loud and habitual nature of the noise, or unless there is other evidence corroborating the testimony of a single witness on this element.(d)The provisions of Subsections (b) and (c) of this section do not apply when the animal is a cat and it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the cat was off the premises of its guardian or keeper at the time of the disturbance.

View official code

Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: Municipal Code: Supplement 167 Update 3).

Full Breakdown

Section 6-1-19(a) prohibits an owner or keeper from allowing an animal to disturb another person's peace through loud and persistent or loud and habitual barking, howling, yelping, braying, whinnying, crowing, calling, or similar noise, whether the animal is on or off its own premises. That broad language reaches roosters and other loud animals as well as dogs. The section builds in two procedural safeguards before a citation can stick. Subsection (b) requires that a written warning, delivered in person or by first-class mail, already have been given to the guardian or keeper within the twelve months preceding the first violation date charged, and the city manager keeps records of every warning as prima facie proof it was given.

Subsection (c) then requires corroboration at trial: no conviction can result unless two or more witnesses testify to the loud and persistent or habitual nature of the noise, or other evidence corroborates a single witness's testimony. Subsection (d) carves out cats from those two safeguards: if the animal is a cat and the prosecution proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the cat was off its guardian's premises when it made the noise, neither the prior-warning nor the two-witness rule applies. Because 6-1-19 lists no penalty of its own, a conviction is punished under the citywide general penalty, Section 5-2-4: up to $2,650 in fines, up to ninety days in jail, or both.

Violations & Fines

Before a citation can be issued, the city must first have sent a written warning about the same animal within the previous twelve months, and a conviction at trial needs two corroborating witnesses to the noise under Section 6-1-19(c). A conviction is punished under the general penalty in Section 5-2-4: up to $2,650 in fines, up to ninety days in jail, or both.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Boulder require a warning before citing a barking dog?
Yes. Section 6-1-19(b) requires the city to have already given the owner a written warning about that animal, delivered in person or by first-class mail, within the twelve months before the first violation date in the complaint. Without a documented warning, a citation cannot proceed.
How does the city prove a dog was 'loud and habitual'?
Section 6-1-19(c) requires either two or more witnesses testifying to the loud and persistent or habitual noise, or other evidence corroborating a single witness. A single unsupported complaint is not enough to convict under this section.
Are cats treated differently under Boulder's noise law?
Yes. Subsection (d) removes the prior-warning and two-witness requirements when the animal is a cat and the prosecution proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the cat was off its guardian's premises during the disturbance.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Boulder

All Boulder rules

Compare Boulder to another location·View the Colorado noise ordinances overview

Get notified when Barking Dogs in Boulder, CO changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.

Barking Dogs in Nearby Cities

How other cities in Boulder County handle barking dogs.

Longmont, CO
Some Restrictions