Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK Noise Ordinances: Barking Dogs (2026)

Some Restrictions
Compiled from the official code textEditor Martyn O'NeillLast verified September 2026

Barking dog rules in Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK, also called nuisance dog, dog noise, or excessive barking ordinances, define when a barking dog becomes a code violation and how complaints are handled.

Key Facts

Governing rule
Animal annoyance ban, § 24.05.030(A)
First-offense fine
$75
Third-offense fine (12 mo.)
$200
Aggressive barking
Can trigger Level 1 classification
Level 1 restraint condition
Confined on owner's property, away from sidewalk

Summary

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Code § 24.05.030(A) makes it unlawful for an owner to let an animal, including a barking dog, annoy any person, and a first violation draws a $75 fine that climbs to $150 and then $200 for repeat offenses within a year. Aggressive barking that scares someone can also trigger a Level 1 dangerous-animal classification.

These county ordinances apply to unincorporated areas of Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Incorporated cities within the county may have their own rules that take precedence over county-level regulations.

It is unlawful for any animal owner to allow an animal to annoy any person. Violation of this provision is an infraction. ... It shall be an affirmative defense that the defendant was already operating an established farm or registered kennel before the complainant(s) moved into the neighborhood, if that farm or registered kennel is the cause of the complaint. ... Aggressive barking; and ... Has by its behavior caused a person to modify, stop, or alter the person's activity; caused a person to fear for a person's safety from the animal's behavior;

Full Breakdown

030(A) states that "it is unlawful for any animal owner to allow an animal to annoy any person," a broad nuisance duty enforced by Animal Care and Regulation that covers persistent or aggressive barking along with other animal-caused disturbances; violating it is an infraction. Two affirmative defenses exist under subsections (C) and (D): it is a defense that the complained-of farm or registered kennel was established before the complaining neighbor moved in, and it is a defense that the complainant provoked the animal into the annoying behavior.

Licensed mushing facility operators, employees and agents get a narrow exemption for sled dogs housed at or originating from that facility, but only while the dogs are actively engaged in mushing activity off the premises. 010(A)(1) establishes a Level 1 classification for an unrestrained animal that engages in aggressive barking, alongside aggressive posturing or lunging, and by that behavior causes a person to modify or stop an activity, fear for their safety, or flee. 040(B)(1): the animal must be physically restrained on the owner's property whenever it's outside the home, positioned so it can't reach a public sidewalk or neighboring property.

Violations & Fines

A first animal-annoyance violation under § 24.05.030 costs $75, a second within 12 months costs $150, and a third costs $200, per the borough's fine schedule at § 24.40.050. Aggressive barking severe enough to trigger a Level 1 dangerous-animal classification instead brings restraint conditions under § 24.26.040(B)(1), and failing to notify the borough of that animal's whereabouts if it later gets loose is a separate infraction fined $100 to $300 depending on prior offenses.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a specific barking-dog ordinance in Mat-Su?
There's no ordinance naming barking by itself. Section 24.05.030(A) bars letting any animal annoy a person, which covers nuisance barking, and separately § 24.26.010(A)(1) treats aggressive barking that frightens someone as grounds for a Level 1 dangerous-animal classification.
What's the fine for a barking dog complaint?
A first animal-annoyance violation under § 24.05.030 is $75, rising to $150 for a second offense and $200 for a third within 12 months, under the fine schedule at § 24.40.050.
Can I defend a barking complaint if my neighbor moved in after my kennel?
Yes. Section 24.05.030(C) makes it an affirmative defense that your farm or registered kennel was already established before the complaining neighbor moved into the area.

Sources & Official References

Other rules in Matanuska-Susitna Borough

All Matanuska-Susitna Borough rules

Compare Matanuska-Susitna Borough to another location·View the Alaska noise ordinances overview

Get notified when Barking Dogs in Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK changes

We'll email you the moment we detect a change in the code. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We'll never sell or share your email. One-click unsubscribe in every email.

See something wrong?

Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.