Berkeley, CA Privacy & Surveillance: License Plate Readers (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing chapter
- BMC Ch. 2.99, enacted 2018
- Approval body
- City Council, Action Calendar item
- Advisory review
- Police Review Commission, 30-day window
- Data sharing rule
- Non-City agreements need prior Council OK
- Annual report due
- First November Council meeting
Summary
Berkeley cannot deploy automatic license plate readers without the City Council approving a public Surveillance Use Policy first. BMC Chapter 2.99 names ALPR as covered Surveillance Technology and requires Council sign-off before acquisition, use expansion, or any data-sharing deal with an outside agency.
1. The City Manager must obtain City Council approval, except in Exigent Circumstances, by placing an item on the Action Calendar at a duly noticed meeting of the City Council prior to any of the following: a. Seeking, soliciting, or accepting grant funds for the purchase of, or in-kind or other donations of, Surveillance Technology; b. Acquiring new Surveillance Technology...; c. Using new Surveillance Technology, or using Surveillance Technology previously approved by the City Council for a purpose, or in a manner not previously approved by the City Council; or d. Entering into an agreement with a non-City entity to acquire, share or otherwise use Surveillance Technology or the information it provides, or expanding a vendor's permission to share or otherwise use Surveillance Technology or the information it provides.
Official source re-checked September 8, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: current through Ordinance 8031-NS, passed July 28, 2026).
Full Breakdown
Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter 2.99, adopted by Ordinance 7592-NS in 2018 and amended by Ordinance 7676-NS in 2019, treats automatic license plate readers as "Surveillance Technology" under BMC 2.99.020. Before the Police Department can acquire ALPR units, use them for a new purpose, or enter an agreement with a non-City entity, including a federal agency such as ICE, to acquire, share, or otherwise use the technology or the data it generates, the City Manager must bring a Surveillance Use Policy and a Surveillance Acquisition Report to the Police Review Commission and then to the City Council's Action Calendar under BMC 2.99.030(1)-(3).
The Surveillance Use Policy required by BMC 2.99.020(4)(g) must fix a data retention period, explain why that period is appropriate, and describe how data is deleted once it lapses; BMC 2.99.020(4)(i) forces disclosure of any third-party vendor's ability to access, sell, or share the collected data. Council can only approve a policy after finding under BMC 2.99.060 that the benefits outweigh the costs, that civil liberties are safeguarded to the maximum extent possible, and that no less-invasive alternative exists. The City Manager must file a public annual Surveillance Technology Report by the first November Council meeting under BMC 2.99.070, covering data sharing, complaints, breaches, and costs for every technology, including ALPR.
Violations & Fines
Acquiring or using ALPR technology, or sharing ALPR data with an outside entity such as ICE, without the required Council-approved Surveillance Use Policy violates BMC 2.99.030. BMC 2.99.090 makes City employee compliance mandatory and subjects violations to disciplinary action, while BMC 2.99.100 protects whistleblowers who report violations from retaliation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Berkeley police share ALPR data with ICE?
Does Berkeley's ALPR policy set a data retention limit?
Who reviews Berkeley's surveillance technology purchases before Council votes?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Berkeley
California rules heatmap·Compare Berkeley to another location·View the California privacy & surveillance overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
License Plate Readers in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Alameda County handle license plate readers.