Skip to main content
CityRuleLookup

Recording & Consent Laws

Privacy & Surveillance

State and local laws about recording audio and video, one-party vs two-party consent requirements, and when recordings can be used as evidence in disputes.

30% permissive36% moderate5% strict(44 locations)

How Recording & Consent Laws Rules Differ by Place

44 places covered2 strict16 moderate13 permissive

Chicago, IL: Illinois Recording Consent Laws (Chicago)

Heavy Restrictions

Illinois is an all-party consent state for audio recording under 720 ILCS 5/14-2. Recording a private conversation without consent from all parties is a felony. The law was amended in…

Seattle, WA: Recording Laws in Seattle and Washington State

Heavy Restrictions

Washington is a two-party (all-party) consent state under RCW 9.73.030. Recording any private conversation without consent from all parties is a gross misdemeanor. This applies to…

Oakland, CA: Right to Record Police Protected in Oakland

Few Restrictions

Oakland Municipal Code § 9.08.270 states that photographing, audio recording or videotaping a police or peace officer in a public place, or from a place the recorder has a right to be…

Denver, CO: Recording Laws in Denver and Colorado

Few Restrictions

Colorado is a one-party consent state under CRS 18-9-303. Only one participant in a conversation needs to consent to recording. Eavesdropping on conversations without any party's…

New York, NY: NYC Right to Record Police

Few Restrictions

New York City law gives anyone the explicit right to record NYPD officers performing police activities and to keep the recording and the device used, with officer interference…

Alameda County, CA: Alameda County Recording & Consent Laws

Some Restrictions

California is a two-party (all-party) consent state. Recording any confidential communication without all parties' consent is a crime under Penal Code 632. This applies to phone calls…