Haverhill, MA Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing law
- City Code §§ 137-17C(1)(b), 137-18B(2)
- Trigger
- Dangerous or potentially dangerous finding
- Chip mode set by
- Animal Control Officer
- Potentially-dangerous surcharge
- $25 per year
- Compliance window (potentially dangerous)
- 21 days, extendable to 60
Summary
Haverhill does not require microchips for every dog. City Code §§ 137-17C and 137-18B let the Chief of Police or Animal Control order microchip identification for a dog declared dangerous or potentially dangerous.
§ 137-17. Dangerous and vicious dogs; violations and penalties. ... ... C. Enforcement, fines and penalties. (1) When a dog is deemed to be dangerous or vicious, the Chief of Police, or his/her designee, shall order the owner to submit written verification to confirm any or all of the following: ... (b) Microchip identification, the mode of which shall be designated by the Animal Control Officer, if the animal is not already microchipped. ... ... § 137-18. Potentially dangerous dogs; violations and penalties. ... ... B. Duties of Animal Control when dog is deemed potentially dangerous. ... (2) Microchip identification, the mode of which shall be designated by the Animal Control Officer, if the animal is not already microchipped.
Full Breakdown
There is no general microchip mandate for dogs kept in the City of Haverhill. Instead, City Code § 137-17C(1)(b) lets the Chief of Police, once a dog has been determined dangerous or vicious under § 137-17A, order the owner to submit written verification of microchip identification if the animal is not already microchipped, with the chip's mode designated by the Animal Control Officer. The identical requirement, word for word, applies one tier down under § 137-18B(2) to dogs the Chief or the Animal Control Officer has instead classified as merely "potentially dangerous": a dog that acts highly aggressively when unprovoked and could jump or escape a fenced yard, or whose owner has been cited more than once in twelve months for letting it run at large.
A potentially dangerous dog's owner must also, per § 137-18C, be at least 18 years old to be responsible for the animal, post a "Beware of Dog" sign per § 137-18D, and pay a $25 annual licensing surcharge under § 137-18E. After two years of compliance, § 137-18B(6) lets the potentially-dangerous designation lapse. Microchipping under either section is one item on a checklist the enforcing officer can require alongside spay/neuter, behavior training, and rabies vaccination; it is not billed as a separate city fee in the chapter.
Violations & Fines
For a dangerous or vicious dog, ignoring the Chief of Police's compliance order (which can include the microchip requirement) triggers the § 137-17C(2) fine schedule: $50 for a first offense with a discretionary hearing, $100 with a mandatory hearing thereafter, potentially ending in banishment or euthanasia. For a potentially dangerous dog, § 137-18F sets fines of $100, $200, and $300 for successive offenses starting 21 days after notice, with each noncompliant day a separate offense and possible District Court enforcement under MGL c. 40, § 21D.
Frequently Asked Questions
Must every dog in Haverhill be microchipped?
Who chooses the type of microchip in Haverhill?
What if my dog is only "potentially dangerous," not dangerous?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Haverhill
Compare Haverhill to another location·View the Massachusetts animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.