Santa Clara, CA Animal Ordinances: Microchipping (2026)
Key Facts
- Trigger
- Dog formally classified as "dangerous" after hearing
- Microchip requirement
- Mandatory implant, § 6.30.150(a)(4)
- Registration
- Annual, with City Manager, fee set by Council
- Insurance minimum
- $100,000 public liability per incident
- Enforcing agency
- SVACA animal control officers
- Non-compliance risk
- Seizure and possible euthanasia
Summary
Santa Clara does not require microchips for pets generally, but a dog formally classified as "dangerous" after a City hearing must have a microchip implant for identification as one of a strict set of confinement and control conditions. Failure to comply can lead to seizure of the dog.
(4) The dog shall have a microchip implant for identification purposes.
Full Breakdown
City Code § 6.30.150 sets the restrictions that apply once a dog has been designated dangerous through the hearing process in § 6.30.140. Subsection (a) lists mandatory conditions the owner or person with the right to control the dog must meet, and item (4) requires that "[t]he dog shall have a microchip implant for identification purposes." That sits alongside other dangerous-dog conditions in the same subsection: spaying or neutering the dog (a)(3), confining it in a securely enclosed, locked kennel or pen with sides embedded at least two feet into the ground and a solid fence at least six feet high (a)(5), muzzling it during any physical restraint with a nonretractable leash no longer than three feet attached to an escape-proof harness (a)(1), and posting a warning sign at every entrance to where the dog is kept, written so a child with normal second-grade reading skills can understand it (a)(8).
The City Manager may also require a specially marked leash, collar or harness to identify the dog as dangerous (a)(2). Owners must additionally register the dog annually with the City Manager and pay a registration fee set by City Council resolution, and carry public liability insurance of at least $100,000 per incident or another surety acceptable to the City Manager (§ 6.30.160(a)-(b)). An animal control officer with the Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority (SVACA) may inquire into compliance and seize any dangerous dog whose owner fails to meet these requirements (§ 6.30.160(f)).
Violations & Fines
An animal control officer is empowered to seize and impound any dangerous dog whose owner fails to comply with the microchip, confinement, registration or insurance requirements (§ 6.30.160(f)). Owners who cannot meet the City Manager's directed requirements must surrender the dog for humane destruction or other disposition at the City Manager's discretion, unless the City Manager determines the dog no longer presents a threat (§ 6.30.160(g)). Violations of Title 6 may otherwise be enforced criminally, civilly or administratively under the general penalty provisions of § 1.05.070, which allow fines up to $1,000 for a misdemeanor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Santa Clara require every dog owner to microchip their pet?
What else must the owner of a dangerous dog do besides microchip it?
What happens if a dangerous dog's owner won't comply with the microchip and confinement rules?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Santa Clara
California rules heatmap·Compare Santa Clara to another location·View the California animal ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Microchipping in Nearby Cities
How other cities in Santa Clara County handle microchipping.