Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK Historic Preservation: Historic-Cultural Monuments (2026)
Key Facts
- Commission size
- Seven members, mayor-appointed, assembly-confirmed
- Authority
- Advisory only; no designation or permit power
- Defines
- "Cultural resources" and "adverse effect" (§4.46.060)
- Key function
- Recommends National Register nominations to the assembly
- Meets
- Quarterly, or as requested (§4.46.035)
Summary
The Matanuska-Susitna Borough's historical preservation commission identifies and recommends protection for cultural resources such as historic buildings, archaeological sites, landmarks and historic districts, but it holds no power to designate a private cultural monument or block its alteration; its role is to advise the assembly and nominate resources to the National Register.
Advise the assembly in identifying, protecting, preserving, and interpreting cultural resources within the borough that are of archaeological, historical, cultural, scientific, or geographic importance; ... Receive, review, and recommend to the assembly nominations for listing borough cultural resources on the National Register of Historic Places; and ... “Cultural resources” includes, but is not limited to, historic buildings, archaeological sites, important landmarks, historical objects, traditional use areas, cultural landscapes, structures, and historic districts.
Full Breakdown
010(A)). 020(A) lists its functions: advising the assembly in identifying, protecting, preserving and interpreting cultural resources of archaeological, historical, cultural, scientific or geographic importance; maintaining an inventory of those resources; recommending a local historic preservation plan compatible with the Alaska Historic Preservation Plan and updated every five to ten years; reviewing local projects that might affect listed properties; and receiving and recommending nominations for the National Register of Historic Places. 060(A) defines 'cultural resources' to include, but not be limited to, historic buildings, archaeological sites, important landmarks, historical objects, traditional use areas, cultural landscapes, structures and historic districts, and defines an 'adverse effect' as any change that may diminish a resource's ability to convey its historical or cultural importance, such as demolishing, relocating or altering a historic structure, destroying an archaeological site, or introducing intrusive elements into a historic district.
The commission's members, appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the assembly, must show expertise in fields such as architecture, history, archaeology or planning, and the borough reimburses only their mileage; the chapter gives the commission no independent authority to approve, deny or condition work on a designated cultural resource.
Violations & Fines
MSB Chapter 4.46 sets out no permit requirement, designation process, or penalty of its own for altering or demolishing a cultural resource; the commission can only recommend protection measures, a preservation plan, or a National Register nomination to the assembly. An owner of a historic structure in the borough outside Wasilla, Palmer and Houston faces no borough-level fine or stop-work order under this chapter for altering the property without the commission's input.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the Mat-Su Borough designate my building a historic landmark?
What counts as a 'cultural resource' under the borough code?
Is there a penalty for altering a historic building in the borough?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Matanuska-Susitna Borough
Compare Matanuska-Susitna Borough to another location·View the Alaska historic preservation overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.