Shoreline, WA Immigration Policy: Sanctuary Policy Preemption (2026)
Key Facts
- Governing chapter
- SMC Ch. 9.40
- Adopted
- Ord. 1059, April 27, 2026
- Covers
- Civil immigration enforcement only
- Exception
- Valid court order or judicial warrant
- Enforcer
- Shoreline city attorney
- Private lawsuit
- Barred by § 9.40.010(C)
Summary
Shoreline Municipal Code Chapter 9.40, adopted by Ordinance 1059 on April 27, 2026, prohibits using any city-owned or city-controlled property as a staging area, processing location or operations base for federal civil immigration enforcement absent a valid court order or judicial warrant. No city officer or employee may consent to such use either.
§ 9.40.030. Use of City property for civil immigration enforcement activities prohibited. A. No city-owned or city-controlled property shall be used as a staging area, processing operations location, operations base, or for other federal civil immigration enforcement activities, unless the immigration officials have obtained a valid court order or judicial warrant. B. No city department, division, officer, or employee shall give consent for federal immigration officials to use areas of city-owned or city-controlled property for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement without a valid court order or as otherwise required by law. Any purported consent shall not be deemed consent by the city for such use. ... ... § 9.40.050. Enforcement. A. The city attorney shall have the ability to enforce this chapter by any legal mechanism of enforcement available under the law.
Full Breakdown
Chapter 9.40 is a locally enacted, codified restriction on federal civil immigration enforcement, not a recitation of state or federal law. Section 9.40.030(A) bars city-owned or city-controlled property, defined broadly in § 9.40.020 to include building interiors and exteriors, parks, parking lots and garages, vacant lots and unopened rights-of-way, from being used as a staging area, processing operations location or operations base for civil immigration enforcement, unless immigration officials present a valid court order or judicial warrant. Section 9.40.030(B) separately forbids any city department, division, officer or employee from consenting to such use without a valid court order, and states that any purported consent given without one is not deemed consent by the city.
The chapter reaches only civil immigration enforcement activity on city property; § 9.40.010 expressly disclaims any effect on the execution of lawful judicial warrants or enforcement of criminal law, and bars any civil suit against the city or its staff for an alleged violation of the chapter. Under § 9.40.040, the city manager may post signage on city property stating the prohibition and may install physical barriers such as locked doors or gates to limit access. Enforcement authority rests with the city attorney, who under § 9.40.050 may use any legal enforcement mechanism available under the law; the chapter does not create a private right of action for residents.
Violations & Fines
The chapter is enforced by the city attorney under § 9.40.050 using any available legal mechanism; § 9.40.010(C) expressly bars any private civil action against the city or its officers, divisions or employees for an alleged violation, so there is no citizen lawsuit or individual fine attached to this chapter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can ICE use Shoreline city property to stage enforcement operations?
Can a city employee let immigration officials onto city property anyway?
Does this chapter stop criminal warrants or arrests?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Shoreline
Compare Shoreline to another location·View the Washington immigration policy overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.
Sanctuary Policy Preemption in Nearby Cities
How other cities in King County handle sanctuary policy preemption.