Burlington, WI Noise Ordinances: Barking Dogs (2026)
Barking dog rules in Burlington, WI, also called nuisance dog, dog noise, or excessive barking ordinances, define when a barking dog becomes a code violation and how complaints are handled.
Key Facts
- Standard
- Noise that materially disturbs or annoys
- "Habitually"
- Customarily, frequently, repeatedly
- Liability
- Owner must knowingly keep/harbor animal
- Complaint source
- Public complaint or officer observation
- Scope
- Applies to any animal, not just dogs
- Penalty
- $5-$500 first offense, § 1-4
Summary
Burlington bars knowingly keeping or harboring any animal that habitually barks, cries, howls or yelps in a way that materially disturbs or annoys another person, under § 104-9. Officers can cite the owner on a public complaint or their own observation, and the Code defines "habitually" as customarily, frequently and repeatedly.
No person shall knowingly keep or harbor any animal which habitually barks, cries, howls, yelps or otherwise makes noise that materially disturbs or annoys another. "Habitually" shall be defined herein as customarily, frequently and repeatedly. A citation may be issued to the animal's owner or to the person keeping or harboring the animal upon a complaint by a member of the public or upon a police officer's observation of a violation.
Official source re-checked September 7, 2026: no newer edition of the code had been published (publisher’s edition: rev 4997580; v29 updated 2026-07-07; through 07-07-2026).
Full Breakdown
Section 104-9, amended May 20, 2003 (Ord. No. 1722(2)), targets any animal, not just dogs, that habitually barks, cries, howls, yelps or otherwise makes noise materially disturbing or annoying another person; the section defines "habitually" to mean customarily, frequently and repeatedly, setting a pattern-of-conduct standard rather than a one-time-noise trigger. The provision reaches the person who "knowingly" keeps or harbors the noisy animal, so an owner unaware of the behavior is not automatically liable, though repeated complaints undercut that defense. Enforcement can start two ways: a member of the public can complain, or a police officer can personally observe a violation, and either path lets an officer issue a citation directly to the animal's owner or to whoever is keeping or harboring the animal, without a separate hearing before the citation issues.
The section sits in Chapter 104, Animals, rather than Chapter 219, Noise, so it is enforced as an animal-control matter through the Police Department alongside the Chapter's licensing and at-large rules, even though its underlying nuisance is a noise complaint. Because the standard turns on a pattern, not a single incident, officers document repeated complaints or repeat observations to establish that the noise is customary, frequent and repeated before citing under this section. Chapter 104 carries no numeric decibel threshold or time-of-day carve-out for barking dogs; the "materially disturbs or annoys" standard here is the entire legal test the City uses.
Violations & Fines
A citation under § 104-9 carries the same forfeiture as any other Chapter 104 offense via § 104-19 and § 1-4: $5 to $500 for a first offense and $10 to $1,000 for a second conviction of the same provision within one year, plus costs of prosecution, with up to 90 days in the county jail if a forfeiture goes unpaid.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a "habitually noisy" animal in Burlington?
Who can report a noisy dog in Burlington?
Is barking-dog enforcement handled under Burlington's noise chapter?
Sources & Official References
Other rules in Burlington
Compare Burlington to another location·View the Wisconsin noise ordinances overview
See something wrong?
Help us keep this page accurate. If you notice an error or outdated information, let us know.